thanks for that, I only had embedded-examples changed, but it looks like I was doing the git pull wrong, that is I was using `git fetch from upstream` instead of `git pull`... I actually never had to use this before :) I was only ever committing with git (used svn/mercurial before though) For some reason I remembered (from a friend) that fetch was the way to pull. So I did the git pull and it worked (the counting worked as expected too, hooray!). Thus my bad, soz :)
I am glad I didn't have to wait 3 days, I even looked into Organizations on github as an alternative way of getting limited (read-only) access to the committers' repo. Now I can continue ... xD On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Michael Hunger < michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > github has no separate repo > for the readonly url > most probably your git pull failed due to local changes > > git stash > them or use > git pull --rebase > > Michael > > mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos > > Am 22.07.2011 um 04:32 schrieb cyuczi eekc <cyuczie...@gmail.com>: > > > Hey, btw, the issue was fixed: > https://trac.neo4j.org/ticket/356#comment:1 > > However, github didn't yet sync the git-readonly (ie. git:// > > github.com/neo4j/community.git ) and looks like I am 3-4 days back, > since my > > HEAD is at: > > > > Minor fix to the cypher/identifiers section. > > < > https://github.com/neo4j/community/commit/dc260c269ae4e09362ada181d7b9a42e6c86560e > > > > > > nawroth <https://github.com/nawroth> (author) > > 3 days ago > > > > as seen here: https://github.com/neo4j/community/commits/master/ > > I guess that is why you didn't say anything yet (because me fetching from > > git would not be able to get the fix yet, 3 more days geezuz xD) > > > > Anyway, I'm only saying this just in case you were not aware this was > fixed > > (apparently by someone else) and you were still working on it. Sorry, I > > already had made a ticket about this before you last replied. > > > > Thank you all, can't wait to test :) > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Hunger < > > michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > > > >> We're already on it. Looking through the causes for that issue and will > >> keep you and everyone else informed. > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> Am 21.07.2011 um 06:52 schrieb cyuczi eekc: > >> > >>> about this, should I create an issue? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Neo4j mailing list > >> User@lists.neo4j.org > >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > User@lists.neo4j.org > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
