you would have never gotten the update git pull does a fetch and merge
please read a quick intro to git there are many on the internets mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos Am 22.07.2011 um 08:10 schrieb cyuczi eekc <cyuczie...@gmail.com>: > thanks for that, I only had embedded-examples changed, but it looks like I > was doing the git pull wrong, that is I was using `git fetch from upstream` > instead of `git pull`... I actually never had to use this before :) I was > only ever committing with git (used svn/mercurial before though) For some > reason I remembered (from a friend) that fetch was the way to pull. > So I did the git pull and it worked (the counting worked as expected too, > hooray!). Thus my bad, soz :) > > I am glad I didn't have to wait 3 days, I even looked into Organizations on > github as an alternative way of getting limited (read-only) access to the > committers' repo. > > Now I can continue ... xD > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Michael Hunger < > michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > >> github has no separate repo >> for the readonly url >> most probably your git pull failed due to local changes >> >> git stash >> them or use >> git pull --rebase >> >> Michael >> >> mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos >> >> Am 22.07.2011 um 04:32 schrieb cyuczi eekc <cyuczie...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hey, btw, the issue was fixed: >> https://trac.neo4j.org/ticket/356#comment:1 >>> However, github didn't yet sync the git-readonly (ie. git:// >>> github.com/neo4j/community.git ) and looks like I am 3-4 days back, >> since my >>> HEAD is at: >>> >>> Minor fix to the cypher/identifiers section. >>> < >> https://github.com/neo4j/community/commit/dc260c269ae4e09362ada181d7b9a42e6c86560e >>> >>> >>> nawroth <https://github.com/nawroth> (author) >>> 3 days ago >>> >>> as seen here: https://github.com/neo4j/community/commits/master/ >>> I guess that is why you didn't say anything yet (because me fetching from >>> git would not be able to get the fix yet, 3 more days geezuz xD) >>> >>> Anyway, I'm only saying this just in case you were not aware this was >> fixed >>> (apparently by someone else) and you were still working on it. Sorry, I >>> already had made a ticket about this before you last replied. >>> >>> Thank you all, can't wait to test :) >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Hunger < >>> michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote: >>> >>>> We're already on it. Looking through the causes for that issue and will >>>> keep you and everyone else informed. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> Am 21.07.2011 um 06:52 schrieb cyuczi eekc: >>>> >>>>> about this, should I create an issue? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Neo4j mailing list >>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
