I use the download option on Github expand the zip in a directory and run mvn install in that directory without any problems. Niels
> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:39:15 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index > > "When running the mvn install, both tests are ran after another." > Since I didn't use mvn (xD) I ran the tests manually one by one, but what > you say makes sense, it's likely the tests fail when ran one after the > other, I'll see what happens with an @Suite > since there are only 2 junit tests, with @Suite they work > Let's see if I could run mvn install (btw, avoided mvn so far because I > cannot install the git plugin for some reason and that other error I get) > Looks like I still need to find out how to fix this error: > [ERROR] The project org.neo4j:neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:0.1-SNAPSHOT > (E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\pom.xml) has 1 error > [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: The repository system is offline but > the artifact org.neo4j:parent-central:pom:18 is not available in the local > repository. and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 3, > column 11 -> [Help 2] > > before I could do anything with maven... > I'll skip trying to make maven to work for me for now, don't feel like it :) > > *I'm not qualified to fix this with maven, sorry* > John > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Niels Hoogeveen > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi John, > > Thanks for looking into this. > > I am still seeing the same error I had before. When running the mvn > > install, both tests are ran after another. For some reason the transaction > > log sees an unclean shutdown and tries to commit pending transactions. > > During that process the index names of the bdb indexes are being retrieved > > from binary storage. Here something goes wrong, because the index name > > returned is garbage, so the recovery process fails because it can't find the > > right index files. > > Niels > > > > > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:48:43 +0200 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index > > > > > > I forked and "fixed", the tests are all working now: > > > https://github.com/13th-floor/bdb-index > > > Let me know if you want me to do a pull request, ... sadly I applied > > > formatting on RawBDBSpeed and the diff doesn't look pretty if you're > > trying > > > to see what changed > > > > > > John. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Niels Hoogeveen > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to find something useful to hide the implementation book keeping > > of > > > > Enhanced API, I tried out dbd-index as can be found here: > > > > https://github.com/peterneubauer/bdb-index > > > > It looks interesting, but fails its tests. When recovering it performs > > > > BerkeleyDbCommand#readCommand from the log. The retrieved indexName is > > not > > > > actually garbage. I would like to help make this component workable, > > but > > > > area of the database is a bit beyond the scope that I know. > > > > I know this is completely unsupported software, but can someone give me > > > > some pointers on how to fix this issue? > > > > Niels > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
