Frank Boehme wrote:
> Well, Emile, *that* asgard *does work*!! Wow! As opposed to the one on
> cvs, admingroups are created together with sitegroups and, so far I have
> no table mess. Thanks a lot for that dump. I do not know, if the fact
> that midgard itself allows for updating tables to a weird state is to be
> seen as a bug or not. If not, then we can happily forget this matter.
Is a bug, oh yes. Please put in a bugreport; whatever detail you can put
in is fine. We'll give it time after the release.
> My other problem was that repligard crash which is now for *me* less
> urgent. Do you still want me to post a repligard debug trace with debug
> symbols?
If you could spare the time, yes please.
> Oh, Emile, if its not too much hassle, could you also make the blobdir
> (matching the data above) repligard-less available? Mine from cvs misses
> some images.
Wasn't there an asgard-blobs-something in the unpacked RPM I sent? If
not I can send them tomorrow morning (I'm not at my workstation right
now).
> I strongly suggest to remove/upgrade asgard on cvs... but I am happy
> know...
Will do.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
