-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi.

- --On 27.03.2002 20:16:49 +0100 Emiliano wrote:

>> > I will unless there's a pressing reason to change it. But nost
>> > users won't see this in action, it'll just be something midgard
>> > does so it can do its job.
>> 
>> Right and wrong. Many more complex websites rely on a mechanism that
>> can dynamically evaluate Midgard Constructs. All of the sites we
>> built here use the eval() thing for example. MidCOM will rely
>> heavily on it. It is no concept for a John-Doe-Standard-User, but
>> most certainly one for a more advanced Midgard Developer.
> 
> But mgd_eval will do this for you too. That's what I meant with 'most
> users won't see this'. Admittedly, calling mgd_preparse directly is
> cleaner but adds clutter to your code. It's a trade-off.

Sure.

Some mails ago you said, that mgd_eval is officially deprecated. This
is what I read out of the fact, that I have to enable
"with-mod-old-midgard". If this is true, we should not encourage its
further use, if not, we should move it back into the official function
set.


Live long and prosper!
Torben Nehmer

- --
Torben Nehmer, Munich, Germany
http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID on wwwkeys.(de.)pgp.net: 0x7E9DE456
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8otK6JPh4Kn6d5FYRAut9AKCsY5iesCcLFOczk6TRexhCfVZ1mwCfc85x
cKfgJiSAB17yU7ESchx/KS0=
=EhW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to