Torben Nehmer wrote:

> > But mgd_eval will do this for you too. That's what I meant with 'most
> > users won't see this'. Admittedly, calling mgd_preparse directly is
> > cleaner but adds clutter to your code. It's a trade-off.
>
> Sure.
>
> Some mails ago you said, that mgd_eval is officially deprecated. This
> is what I read out of the fact, that I have to enable
> "with-mod-old-midgard". If this is true, we should not encourage its
> further use, if not, we should move it back into the official function
> set.

I didn't mean to say it's depracated. I meant to say its
_implementation_ is depracated. mgd_eval continues to be available, the
preparser will simply replace it inline. It will no longer show up in
the function list, true.

Emile



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to