Torben Nehmer wrote: > As far as I remeber, mgd_eval worked with the same semantics as the > classic eval. So the latter beavoir sould be used. Anything else would > be irritating anyhow, since many will associate mgd_eval and eval > together.
I agree... so you agree that the second implementation would do the right thing? This will take some testing to make sure we got it right. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
