-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
- --On 28.03.2002 12:55:15 +0100 Emiliano wrote:
>> As far as I remeber, mgd_eval worked with the same semantics as the
>> classic eval. So the latter beavoir sould be used. Anything else
>> would be irritating anyhow, since many will associate mgd_eval and
>> eval together.
>
> I agree... so you agree that the second implementation would do the
> right thing? This will take some testing to make sure we got it right.
I agree. To be sure I tested it again: In an about 4 Months old Non-MMP
Midgard the following to lines were equivalent.
mgd_eval("?><[page-$view]><?");
eval("?><[page-$view]><?");
Live long and prosper!
Torben Nehmer
- --
Torben Nehmer, Munich, Germany
http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID on wwwkeys.(de.)pgp.net: 0x7E9DE456
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8oxZcJPh4Kn6d5FYRAvXoAJ0azRfVY9mVWCRYEpxMh9E5nbUwmACfb5Ye
+sKTvJzuesQ6df5wQFzxnE0=
=Y9EU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
