David, I guess that Leon and Opentaps guys in general want to open their cookbooks to the community. Like I said before why not migrate and integrate them to this page below (The Open For Business Project Wiki) ? I believe both parties (OFBiz and Opentaps communities) will take advantage of this move.
BTW, it should be better if all pages were below Home page. If someone has some time to spent to rearrange that... TIA Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:18 AM Subject: Re: OFBiz/opentaps as a small business accounting package? > > Is there something wrong with the current OFBiz wiki linked to below? > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/listpages-dirview.action?key=OFBIZ > > -David > > > On Jan 18, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Leon Torres wrote: > > > I also believe it would be worthwhile to experiment with an open > > ofbiz wiki. As the ofbiz community continues to grow, we will > > certainly attain the critical mass necessary to make such a thing > > work. > > > > For instance, we've authored a bunch of cookbooks in .txt format > > about specific tricks and how-to's in OFBIZ: > > > > http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/ofbiz/tutorials.php > > > > Unfortunately contributing to those is hard because it takes an > > investment in time to read, verify, and update the documents on our > > end. If they were in the form of an open wiki, it would be far > > easier to expand on them. > > > > - Leon > > > > > > Florin Jurcovici wrote: > >> IMO, an open wiki is the right thing to do. Even if I had some > >> experience which I'd like to share, if the wiki is closed or > >> restricted, I cannot. Some maintainers should review docs > >> occasionally and correct or delete them if they are not OK, maybe > >> draw an outline of the documentation at the beginning then let > >> whoever is willing to fill the pages. But IMO a closed/restricted > >> wiki is not the way to go. > >> --Florin Jurcovici > >> ------------------ > >> Why do psychics have to ask you for your name? > >
