I meant only restricted from anonymous modification. I have observed some other projects that have completely open wikis and whole pages are regularly destroyed by spammers.
I cannot see why anyone should object to registering in order to add to a wiki. If a spammer registers then the registration can be cancelled if they prove to be a spammer. Or am I missing something? Kind regards, Andrew Ballantine. -----Original Message----- From: Florin Jurcovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 January 2007 19:35 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OFBiz/opentaps as a small business accounting package? IMO, an open wiki is the right thing to do. Even if I had some experience which I'd like to share, if the wiki is closed or restricted, I cannot. Some maintainers should review docs occasionally and correct or delete them if they are not OK, maybe draw an outline of the documentation at the beginning then let whoever is willing to fill the pages. But IMO a closed/restricted wiki is not the way to go. -- Florin Jurcovici ------------------ Why do psychics have to ask you for your name? -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 03:36 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 03:36 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 03:36 ***************************************************************** This email has been checked by the altohiway Mailcontroller Service *****************************************************************
