Hi Valentina,
I have tried the way you have suggested but if you don't give product type as
WIP then mandatory production run does not result into. Other than this if I
create two seperate production runs then it is of no use because what if an
organisation have 10-15 intermediate stages in manufacturing process then it
has to run all the processes one by one which I think is not feasible. My aim
is to create only one production run coresponding to the finished product and
all the intermediate processes invokes automatically. If you have done this
sort of process then please share.
Thanks
Brijesh M.
Valentina Sirkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Brijesh,
I think there is a way to constitute mandatory production runs without
making the product WIP.
If for example production run number1 has BOM consisting of
products(types finished good for example) B and C and on the other hand
production run number2 produces B as its end product then these to
production runs become dependent on one another.
This is because product B of the first production is waiting to get
produced by the second production so it could be finally used in the
first one.This results in mandatory production runs and inventory gets
increased.
Valentina
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 10:12 -0700, brijesh m wrote:
> if I will not use WIP then it is not possible for me to constitute the
> "mandatory-dependent" association for production runs as it is only
> done if I take WIP as product type (I have tested this). Please
> suggest the way out.
