should take a look at the datamodel book Vol II on Manufacturing.
brijesh m sent the following on 7/28/2008 6:57 AM: > Hi Valentina, > I have tried the way you have suggested but if you don't give product type as > WIP then mandatory production run does not result into. Other than this if I > create two seperate production runs then it is of no use because what if an > organisation have 10-15 intermediate stages in manufacturing process then it > has to run all the processes one by one which I think is not feasible. My aim > is to create only one production run coresponding to the finished product and > all the intermediate processes invokes automatically. If you have done this > sort of process then please share. > > Thanks > Brijesh M. > > Valentina Sirkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Brijesh, > > I think there is a way to constitute mandatory production runs without > making the product WIP. > > If for example production run number1 has BOM consisting of > products(types finished good for example) B and C and on the other hand > production run number2 produces B as its end product then these to > production runs become dependent on one another. > This is because product B of the first production is waiting to get > produced by the second production so it could be finally used in the > first one.This results in mandatory production runs and inventory gets > increased. > Valentina > > On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 10:12 -0700, brijesh m wrote: >> if I will not use WIP then it is not possible for me to constitute the >> "mandatory-dependent" association for production runs as it is only >> done if I take WIP as product type (I have tested this). Please >> suggest the way out. > > > > > >
