Yup you got the command right On Apr 20, 2017 5:03 AM, "Craig Parker" <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, this (I tried them one at a time to see what happens -- and noticed > stopping and starting ofbiz appears to be necessary): > > ./gradlew "ofbiz --load-data readers=seed" > ./gradlew "ofbiz --load-data readers=seed-initial" > ./gradlew loadAdminUserLogin -PuserLoginId=admin > > will give me an ofbiz install ready, data-wise, to start using in a > production environment? At this point I'd start keying in products, > vendors, etc ? > > Will this: > > ./gradlew "ofbiz --load-data readers=seed,seed-initial loadAdminUserLogin > -PuserLoginId=admin" > > Get it all done in one fell swoop? Readme wasn't clear, to me at least. > > I'm still a ways off, and hope to be helping along with docs as I go, but > I'm just trying to find the "you are here" sign. > > On 04/19/2017 03:35 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> Hi Craig, >> >> the name loadDefault may be a bit misleading: it actually loads the seed >> data but also testing and demo data (maybe loadAll may be more accurate). >> Anyway, you are probably looking for: >> >> ./gradlew "ofbiz --load-data readers=seed,seed-initial" >> >> You will find a description of the various options and their meaning in >> the >> README.md file section titled "Data loading tasks". >> >> Regards, >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Craig Parker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> ./gradlew cleanAll loadDefault will load some test data. Or is that wrong? >>> I'm only thinking so because I saw things in the PRODUCTS table besides >>> the >>> item I started creating. >>> >>> Dropping the databases, running and firing OFBiz up again seems to have >>> rebuilt the databases (I thought I'd read somewhere that they'd get >>> rebuilt >>> like that), but there's no data. This was the desired effect, but I can't >>> launch the software now. I can post the whole error, or just say that I >>> see >>> a lot of "Template location is empty" messages. >>> >>> Is that the right way to start with a clean slate and I missed a step, or >>> is that totally wrong? >>> >>> >
