inline On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote:
> Le 08/05/2017 à 10:20, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > >> I don't think we need to repeat ourselves. The discussion in this thread >> already mentioned names to replace loadDefault >> > > So I understand that loadAllData, which is quite clear, is OK to replace > loadDefault > The only one who proposed loadAllData is you > As for shutdown, this is again repeating a discussion that was had a while >> ago and shows in detail why it was not _replaced_ >> > Please do you have a reference I can't find nor remember an explanation :/ > Maybe few words again would be easier? > "shutdown" is a server command (probably since the beginning of the project), "stop" was an ant target. We discussed in the ML and JIRA multiple times that we should reduce the amount of tasks to a minimum and instead let users control the system directly by issuing server commands. The server commands are --start --shutdown --load-data --test --portoffset and --help I don't have a problem in renaming --shutdown to --stop as a server command. The problem is in adding new shortcut tasks in gradle because you then lose the flexibility of issuing commands to OFBiz. The only shortcut commands that exist are loadDefault and testIntegration because we have to run them every time before making a commit "gradlew cleanAll loadDefault testIntegration". Beyond that, we're just repeating ourselves needlessly and confusing users. One example where we lose value is in debugging. For example, take the following variations: ./gradlew "ofbiz --test" ./gradlew "ofbizDebug --test" ./gradlew "ofbiz --shutdown" ./gradlew "ofbizDebug --shutdown" As you can can see, giving the user flexibility in debugging whatever command she issues is an advantage. If users, however, are not familiar with the server commands and they rely on the shortcut commands, then they lose the above mentioned advantage. > > Jacques > > >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >>> >>> Would we agree on loadAllData? >>> >>> I also would like to replace shutdown by stop (we have start, so stop), >>> agreed? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 19/04/2017 à 20:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>> >>> Maybe loadAllData ? >>>> >>>> And what about stop instead of shutdown. Why shutdown replaced stop? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 19/04/2017 à 10:12, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >>>> >>>> I would suggest "loadData" to keep it consistent with the actual alias >>>>> "--load-data" and in the README.md and task description describe what >>>>> that >>>>> means. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for loadAll, clearer indeed >>>>> >>>>>> I also got trapped by "shutdown" (for ofbizBackground), instead of >>>>>> "stop" >>>>>> we had before. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you agree (All) to change it too? Not too late right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 19/04/2017 à 09:35, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Craig, >>>>>> >>>>>>> the name loadDefault may be a bit misleading: it actually loads the >>>>>>> seed >>>>>>> data but also testing and demo data (maybe loadAll may be more >>>>>>> accurate). >>>>>>> Anyway, you are probably looking for: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ./gradlew "ofbiz --load-data readers=seed,seed-initial" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You will find a description of the various options and their meaning >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> README.md file section titled "Data loading tasks". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Craig Parker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ./gradlew cleanAll loadDefault will load some test data. Or is that >>>>>>> wrong? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm only thinking so because I saw things in the PRODUCTS table >>>>>>>> besides >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> item I started creating. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dropping the databases, running and firing OFBiz up again seems to >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> rebuilt the databases (I thought I'd read somewhere that they'd get >>>>>>>> rebuilt >>>>>>>> like that), but there's no data. This was the desired effect, but I >>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>> launch the software now. I can post the whole error, or just say >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>> a lot of "Template location is empty" messages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is that the right way to start with a clean slate and I missed a >>>>>>>> step, or >>>>>>>> is that totally wrong? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >
