I guess I understand your plan ....
You would like to have all issues fixed in 4.0.2 :))))

I propose to have "less, but better", i.e. check all wishes, put priority
1) I will not upgrade is "feature A" will not be implemented
2) "feature B" will make my life much easier
3) "feature C" is nice to have

I don't have too much time, and this way I can better plan my work :))

I'll check this dot, I do remember it might be green/red and it should be
yellow ... will double-check


Right now poll will work very similar to your "quick poll" in case you have
asked a question all room user will have pop-up dialog: WDYT? then poll can
be archived/deleted ....
IMHO the only difference is the way it is displayed .....

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote:

> separate threads could help to keep the things present... How do we
> prioritize it?
>
> I got one more thing in mind in the evening...
>
> 9. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-131
>
> I need to have a look about room files... :-) and presenter role I found
> now... I think they should mark different than normal user. Yellow dot
> instead of green?
>
>
>
>
>
> The thing I suggest as quick poll is not really a pool it is more a
> simplified student response system... It is just a tool to ask "WDYT?" and
> is is important that it is a single click operation (for the teacher and
> the student). No need to save it no need to let is visible longer than the
> teacher is asking. And I think this will work perfectly beside poll. Poll
> should be a tool that is more than a simple "WDYT?". I think these polls
> should be prepared before the meeting and they are a pedagogical
> instrument. Btw.. I think if there is time left we could have a look how to
> improve current poll... ;-)
>
> Greetings Peter
>
>
> Am 28.12.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> this seems to be huge list :)
> Some of these items were implemented (like room files and presenter role)
> some seems to be not very critical (like redo, and a&a place)
>
> According to quick poll: I would like to discuss it first, this seems to
> be the same thing as current poll (on screen vote, instead of dialog), not
> sure we need 2 instances of poll :))
>
> Can we have separate threads for remaining issues? with some
> prioritization?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think there are a few little things left and maybe a few improvements
>> should be discussed. I think we should use a new thread to do this.
>>
>> I think design of the room is almost finished with the latest chat
>> improvements just the a&a field is left.
>>
>> I think a&a should share the space with the user list. A&a should have
>> the same with than the user list. When hidden user list has max height if
>> a&a is visible user list should have reduced height (scrollbar if needed).
>>
>> This is really the last thing that is missing in the design.
>>
>>
>> I will fetch up now all ideas from former threads that should be
>> discussed I think (no priority just how I find and remember them...).
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1791
>>
>> 2. Redo Button for wb
>>
>> 3.
>>
>> Additionally we have number of 
>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1613https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-369https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-370https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-371https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-374
>>
>> All this about introducing new room role: "Presenter"
>> This role has less rights than Moderator, but more rights than "Draw
>> on whiteboard"
>>
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1671 (I still need
>> to test room files for this and there was an Idea for scheduled meetings to
>> implement a kind of countdown (audio/video) till start time)
>>
>> 5. We have implemented an area where the video pods "dock" when the
>> meeting starts, although they can be repositioned at any time by the
>> participants. See attached screenshot. the docking area is above the
>> whiteboards.
>>
>>
>>
>> *[image: Inline image 1] *6. It would be great to implement an option,
>> to put the video-pod of a given moderator (presenter? see 3.) to a fixed
>> position on the whiteboard in a presentation room. This is the place where
>> the video-pod of the moderator should be displayed. The moderator just
>> leave this part in his presentation blank and is visible for the audience.
>> I think for a normal presentation this should be the default case for the
>> audience. Max whiteboard and chat and the rest is minimized or hidden.
>>
>> 7. user-list sorting by name and by latest actions
>>
>> 8. dynamic room layouts
>>
>> commented till now "
>>
>> I'm afraid functionality like this "Then the moderator has the ability
>> to change the layout to his needs"
>> requires sort of templating ....
>> So CSS dynamically created by one user will be applied to others ....
>> "
>>
>>
>> That's all things I found in the discussions. If I missed something pleas
>> add here. And lets start think about what is implementable and what is the
>> priority for this.
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to