4.0.3 would be early enough... ;-)
I know that you are the only one that develop the things...
unfortunately my programming skills are not that good... :-(
I know that it is in fact a simple yes/no poll... and you really can
take it as a wish/feature request... I would like to get feedback. All
the things I mention come because of feedback from teachers. All the
little things are the difference between "I like to use this program"
and "I have to use this program" ... ;-)
The main difference to poll is that it is a two click operation for the
teacher (start and stop -> left mouse on button in wb menu or hotkey?)
and for student it is a one click operation (thumb up ore down in wb
menu usable as long as the teacher has the poll open or hotkey?). The
result disappears right (3 seconds?) after 2nd click of the teacher.
Greetings Peter
Am 28.12.2017 um 11:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
I guess I understand your plan ....
You would like to have all issues fixed in 4.0.2 :))))
I propose to have "less, but better", i.e. check all wishes, put priority
1) I will not upgrade is "feature A" will not be implemented
2) "feature B" will make my life much easier
3) "feature C" is nice to have
I don't have too much time, and this way I can better plan my work :))
I'll check this dot, I do remember it might be green/red and it should
be yellow ... will double-check
Right now poll will work very similar to your "quick poll" in case you
have asked a question all room user will have pop-up dialog: WDYT?
then poll can be archived/deleted ....
IMHO the only difference is the way it is displayed .....
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
separate threads could help to keep the things present... How do
we prioritize it?
I got one more thing in mind in the evening...
9. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-131
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-131>
I need to have a look about room files... :-) and presenter role I
found now... I think they should mark different than normal user.
Yellow dot instead of green?
The thing I suggest as quick poll is not really a pool it is more
a simplified student response system... It is just a tool to ask
"WDYT?" and is is important that it is a single click operation
(for the teacher and the student). No need to save it no need to
let is visible longer than the teacher is asking. And I think this
will work perfectly beside poll. Poll should be a tool that is
more than a simple "WDYT?". I think these polls should be prepared
before the meeting and they are a pedagogical instrument. Btw.. I
think if there is time left we could have a look how to improve
current poll... ;-)
Greetings Peter
Am 28.12.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
Hello Peter,
this seems to be huge list :)
Some of these items were implemented (like room files and
presenter role)
some seems to be not very critical (like redo, and a&a place)
According to quick poll: I would like to discuss it first, this
seems to be the same thing as current poll (on screen vote,
instead of dialog), not sure we need 2 instances of poll :))
Can we have separate threads for remaining issues? with some
prioritization?
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
I think there are a few little things left and maybe a few
improvements should be discussed. I think we should use a new
thread to do this.
I think design of the room is almost finished with the latest
chat improvements just the a&a field is left.
I think a&a should share the space with the user list.
A&a should have the same with than the user list. When
hidden user list has max height if a&a is visible user
list should have reduced height (scrollbar if needed).
This is really the last thing that is missing in the design.
I will fetch up now all ideas from former threads that should
be discussed I think (no priority just how I find and
remember them...).
1.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1791
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1791>
2. Redo Button for wb
3.
Additionally we have number of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1613
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1613>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-369
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-369>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-370
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-370>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-371
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-371>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-374
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-374>
All this about introducing new room role: "Presenter"
This role has less rights than Moderator, but more rights than
"Draw
on whiteboard"
4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1671
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1671>
(I still need to test room files for this and there was
an Idea for scheduled meetings to implement a kind of
countdown (audio/video) till start time)
5. We have implemented an area where the video pods
"dock" when the meeting starts, although they can be
repositioned at any time by the participants. See
attached screenshot. the docking area is above the
whiteboards.
/
/
/Inline image 1
/6. It would be great to implement an option, to put the
video-pod of a given moderator (presenter? see 3.) to a
fixed position on the whiteboard in a presentation room.
This is the place where the video-pod of the moderator
should be displayed. The moderator just leave this part
in his presentation blank and is visible for the
audience. I think for a normal presentation this should
be the default case for the audience. Max whiteboard and
chat and the rest is minimized or hidden.
7. user-list sorting by name and by latest actions
8. dynamic room layouts
commented till now "
I'm afraid functionality like this "Then the
moderator has the ability to change the layout to his
needs"
requires sort of templating ....
So CSS dynamically created by one user will be
applied to others ....
"
That's all things I found in the discussions. If I missed
something pleas add here. And lets start think about what
is implementable and what is the priority for this.
Greetings Peter
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
