Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or hadoop2 from a functional point of view? Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom > issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the > default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects > poms are authored). > > Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I > guess we can leave support there a while longer. > > Thanks, > James > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x. > > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too. > > > > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop 1. > > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is > retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet). > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > > To: "d...@phoenix.apache.org" <d...@phoenix.apache.org>; user < > user@phoenix.apache.org> > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM > > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still? > > > > Hello, > > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases > > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice if > > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two > > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync. > > > > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x > releases? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > >
