So Hoya is a different thing from Hbase on hadoop 2? On Sep 25, 2014 11:23 PM, "Jesse Yates" <jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mostly its the use of hadoop metrics2 that has to change, as they change > the backing methods. If you are interested, take the hbase compatibility > layer <https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/master/hbase-hadoop-compat/> > to see most of where HBase shims things. > > ------------------- > Jesse Yates > @jesse_yates > jyates.github.com > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> > wrote: > >> Any help here? :( >> On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> >> wrote: >> >>> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or >>> hadoop2 from a functional point of view? >>> Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features? >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom >>>> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the >>>> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects >>>> poms are authored). >>>> >>>> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I >>>> guess we can leave support there a while longer. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> James >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x. >>>> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too. >>>> > >>>> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop 1. >>>> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is >>>> retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet). >>>> > >>>> > -- Lars >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>> > From: James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >>>> > To: "d...@phoenix.apache.org" <d...@phoenix.apache.org>; user < >>>> user@phoenix.apache.org> >>>> > Cc: >>>> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM >>>> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still? >>>> > >>>> > Hello, >>>> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases >>>> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice if >>>> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two >>>> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync. >>>> > >>>> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x >>>> releases? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > James >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >
