Any help here? :( On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or > hadoop2 from a functional point of view? > Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features? > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom >> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the >> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects >> poms are authored). >> >> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I >> guess we can leave support there a while longer. >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: >> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x. >> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too. >> > >> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop 1. >> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is >> retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet). >> > >> > -- Lars >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >> > To: "d...@phoenix.apache.org" <d...@phoenix.apache.org>; user < >> user@phoenix.apache.org> >> > Cc: >> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM >> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still? >> > >> > Hello, >> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases >> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice if >> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two >> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync. >> > >> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x >> releases? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > James >> > >> > >
