If you need a hand I can help because we also need Phoenix on CDH. Maybe I could writie some documentation about it's installation and usage, on the README or on the official Phoenix site. Let's set up a an unofficial (but working) repo of Phoenix Parcels!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well I'd say it's the only option left to some of us to use Phoenix in our > clients/companies. Most of them only go for commercial distributions of > Hadoop for obvious reasons and cannot afford keeping up with frequent > platform update. In our case each platform migration is bigger (in terms of > effort etc) than some projects. > > Cloudera stopped porting it to CDH because of strategic reasons. Basically > they say that Kudu does everything that Phoenix do... . Marketing strategy > I guess. And we cannot stay with Phoenix 4.5 and CDH 5.5 (and no bugfixes) > forever. > > In the other hand Hortonworks already keeps Phoenix within their own > distribution so in this case the vendor itself sees strategic advantage on > this. > > As long as I work for the same company I'll have to port Phoenix to CDH. > So I could help with it guys. > > Maybe my only issue to publish the parcels is getting web hosting for > them. > > > > On 27 Oct 2017 06:35, "James Taylor" <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > >> This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would >> it make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix >> release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases. >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D >>> skipTests=true" . >>> >>> And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target >>> >>> On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: >>> >>>> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation >>>> about this? >>>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado" <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work >>>>> from chiastic-security. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2 >>>>> >>>>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for >>>>> parcel-generation in rhel6. >>>>> >>>>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats. >>>>> >>>>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I >>>>> haven't looked further into them yet. >>>>> >>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this >>>>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <jean-m...@spaggiari.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a >>>>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable... >>>>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it >>>>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that >>>>> for the last version, but will require some efforts... >>>>> >>>>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>: >>>>> >>>>>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official >>>>>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight >>>>>> coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API >>>>>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes. >>>>>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true? >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P >>>>>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi >>>>>> ghlight/true#M378 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll take care of it ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" <sergeysolda...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Flavio, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about >>>>>>>> their plan for further releases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Sergey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi to all, >>>>>>>>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to >>>>>>>>> release a newer version? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>
