I totally agree wrt some compatibility matrix. I think that CDH compatibility and parcels release should be something that people of Apache Phoenix could support somehow..am I wrong?
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are problems regarding version support and bugfixes. As HBase in CDH > has been "enhaced" by Cloudera we'd need to mark certain specific cdh > versions as supported (up to major.minor.fix version) . For instance CDH > 5.11.1 doesn't pass tests because of an unsolved issue in Cloudera's HBase. > > I think this is not about sharing a parcel now and stop doing it, right? > Also there are "financial" issues in terms of servers that I'd probably > need help with. > > On 27 Oct 2017 08:49, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: > >> If you need a hand I can help because we also need Phoenix on CDH. Maybe >> I could writie some documentation about it's installation and usage, on the >> README or on the official Phoenix site. Let's set up a an unofficial (but >> working) repo of Phoenix Parcels! >> >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Well I'd say it's the only option left to some of us to use Phoenix in >>> our clients/companies. Most of them only go for commercial distributions of >>> Hadoop for obvious reasons and cannot afford keeping up with frequent >>> platform update. In our case each platform migration is bigger (in terms of >>> effort etc) than some projects. >>> >>> Cloudera stopped porting it to CDH because of strategic reasons. >>> Basically they say that Kudu does everything that Phoenix do... . Marketing >>> strategy I guess. And we cannot stay with Phoenix 4.5 and CDH 5.5 (and no >>> bugfixes) forever. >>> >>> In the other hand Hortonworks already keeps Phoenix within their own >>> distribution so in this case the vendor itself sees strategic advantage on >>> this. >>> >>> As long as I work for the same company I'll have to port Phoenix to CDH. >>> So I could help with it guys. >>> >>> Maybe my only issue to publish the parcels is getting web hosting for >>> them. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 Oct 2017 06:35, "James Taylor" <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would >>>> it make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix >>>> release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> James >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D >>>>> skipTests=true" . >>>>> >>>>> And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target >>>>> >>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any >>>>>> documentation about this? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado" <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work >>>>>>> from chiastic-security. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for >>>>>>> parcel-generation in rhel6. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and >>>>>>> I haven't looked further into them yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this >>>>>>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <jean-m...@spaggiari.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a >>>>>>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's >>>>>>> doable... >>>>>>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it >>>>>>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> for the last version, but will require some efforts... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official >>>>>>>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight >>>>>>>> coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API >>>>>>>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes. >>>>>>>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P >>>>>>>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi >>>>>>>> ghlight/true#M378 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll take care of it ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" <sergeysolda...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Flavio, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about >>>>>>>>>> their plan for further releases. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Sergey >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi to all, >>>>>>>>>>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan >>>>>>>>>>> to release a newer version? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>
