Really thanks for your reply . I will try it now . but I'm asking about that if I run supervisor with high core then it will give me high performance for topology right ?
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]> wrote: > I am recommending that you that try that approach first (storm + zoo on > core2 duo; super on i5). I would expect more thread contention (decrease > performance) if you choose to reverse the deployment strategy. > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > On Mar 21, 2016, at 11:18, sam mohel <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Thanks for replying . so I should run nimbus ,zookeeper on machine > core2duo and supervisor on core I 5 but Are results will change if I run it > in reverse . > > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Sam, >> >> Nimbus and Zookeeper mostly perform management of the cluster itself - >> not performing real work. Given your situation, place the Supervisor on the >> high-performant system (core i5). >> >> Justin >> >> On Mar 20, 2016, at 23:15, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is there any help ? >> >> On Monday, March 21, 2016, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have 2 machine one has core 2duo and other has core i5 . which one >>> should I run nimbus and zookeeper on it and which one should I run >>> supervisor ? >>> >>> Should worker run on machine with high core or it shouldn't ? >>> >>> Appreciate your help >>> Thanks in advance >>> >> >> >
