Thanks again. Last question about storm ui . when I submitted topology numbers that appeared changed every time I refreshed page . so how can I get numbers rightly ?
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]> wrote: > Right. > > On Mar 21, 2016, at 14:16, sam mohel <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Really thanks for your reply . I will try it now . but I'm asking about > that if I run supervisor with high core then it will give me high > performance for topology right ? > > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> I am recommending that you that try that approach first (storm + zoo on >> core2 duo; super on i5). I would expect more thread contention (decrease >> performance) if you choose to reverse the deployment strategy. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Justin >> >> >> >> On Mar 21, 2016, at 11:18, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for replying . so I should run nimbus ,zookeeper on machine >> core2duo and supervisor on core I 5 but Are results will change if I run it >> in reverse . >> >> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sam, >>> >>> Nimbus and Zookeeper mostly perform management of the cluster itself - >>> not performing real work. Given your situation, place the Supervisor on the >>> high-performant system (core i5). >>> >>> Justin >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 23:15, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any help ? >>> >>> On Monday, March 21, 2016, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have 2 machine one has core 2duo and other has core i5 . which one >>>> should I run nimbus and zookeeper on it and which one should I run >>>> supervisor ? >>>> >>>> Should worker run on machine with high core or it shouldn't ? >>>> >>>> Appreciate your help >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>> >>> >> >
