Thanks but how can I decide it  . or what are the conditions that make me
know it ?


In Tuesday, March 22, 2016, Erik Weathers <[email protected]> wrote:

> That *entirely* depends on your topology and environment.
>
> - Erik
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:27 PM, sam mohel <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> I mean numbers which I got in complete latency and execute latency . when
>> I submitted topology those numbers changed every time I refreshed page of
>> storm ui . when it becomes stable to measure performance of topology
>>
>>  Tuesday, March 22, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sam,
>>>
>>> Which numbers are you speaking of? And by “get the numbers rightly”,
>>> what do you mean by that?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 14:30, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks again. Last question about storm ui . when I submitted topology
>>>  numbers that appeared changed every time I refreshed page . so how can I
>>> get numbers rightly ?
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 14:16, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Really thanks for your reply . I will try it now . but I'm asking about
>>>> that if I run supervisor with high core then it will give me high
>>>> performance for topology  right ?
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am recommending that you that try that approach first (storm + zoo
>>>>> on core2 duo; super on i5). I would expect more thread contention 
>>>>> (decrease
>>>>> performance) if you choose to reverse the deployment strategy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 11:18, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for replying . so I should run nimbus ,zookeeper on machine
>>>>> core2duo and supervisor on core I 5 but Are results will change if I run 
>>>>> it
>>>>> in reverse .
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sam,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nimbus and Zookeeper mostly perform management of the cluster itself
>>>>>> - not performing real work. Given your situation, place the Supervisor on
>>>>>> the high-performant system (core i5).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 23:15, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any help ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, March 21, 2016, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have 2 machine one has core 2duo and other has core i5 . which one
>>>>>>> should I run nimbus and zookeeper on it and which one should I run
>>>>>>> supervisor ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should worker run on machine with high core or it shouldn't ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Appreciate your help
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to