Sam, Which numbers are you speaking of? And by “get the numbers rightly”, what do you mean by that?
Thanks, Justin On Mar 21, 2016, at 14:30, sam mohel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks again. Last question about storm ui . when I submitted topology numbers that appeared changed every time I refreshed page . so how can I get numbers rightly ? On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Right. On Mar 21, 2016, at 14:16, sam mohel <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: Really thanks for your reply . I will try it now . but I'm asking about that if I run supervisor with high core then it will give me high performance for topology right ? On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: I am recommending that you that try that approach first (storm + zoo on core2 duo; super on i5). I would expect more thread contention (decrease performance) if you choose to reverse the deployment strategy. Thanks, Justin On Mar 21, 2016, at 11:18, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks for replying . so I should run nimbus ,zookeeper on machine core2duo and supervisor on core I 5 but Are results will change if I run it in reverse . On Monday, March 21, 2016, Justin Hopper <[email protected]> wrote: Sam, Nimbus and Zookeeper mostly perform management of the cluster itself - not performing real work. Given your situation, place the Supervisor on the high-performant system (core i5). Justin On Mar 20, 2016, at 23:15, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: Is there any help ? On Monday, March 21, 2016, sam mohel <[email protected]> wrote: I have 2 machine one has core 2duo and other has core i5 . which one should I run nimbus and zookeeper on it and which one should I run supervisor ? Should worker run on machine with high core or it shouldn't ? Appreciate your help Thanks in advance
