Ah, personal attack, thanks. I wouldn't want people to think that it's not possible to write decent tests with Struts 1.x.
It is. On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sigh ...... Dion, I am sorry, but I am not going to stoop this > low. Come > back later when you are grown up in this business. I hate to do this but > I > am not going to start at 101 with you. Someone else can. I am not going > to. You DON'T have a clue about these issues and don't even realize that > you are revealing that in spades. Please do yourself a favor and bow out > gracefully. > > On 3/29/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Dion, you are obviously really green. Please read a bit and then come > > > back. Do you have any idea about architecture and design and testing > > > issues? > > > > > > Yes, I do. Do you? > > > > So, the use of StrutsTestCase has an effect on architecture and design? > > Are you saying you can't test your code using it? I seem to do it > > reasonably > > easily. > > > > On 3/29/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > God, Joe! If you don't know what is wrong with Struts 1.x then > > stand > > > > > aside. For one, try writing decent tests. Do you test your code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So StrutsTestCase doesn't help you? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/29/06, Joe Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathon, > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't answer Dion's question. You merely summarized that > > Struts > > > > and > > > > > > WebWork merged. > > > > > > You did not state any technical reasons that Struts 1.x is > wrong. > > > > > > The question was "Do you have a list of > > > > > > things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?" > > > > > > > > > > > > You complain that people don't answer questions on this list and > > > look > > > > > what > > > > > > you've just done. > > > > > > > > > > > > So do you have an answer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >You should not use me as some kind of scapegoat to take out > your > > > > > > >frustrations on. Take this stuff up with the Struts PMC, not > > > > > > >with me. >Jonathan Revusky > > > > > > > > > > > > Very unbecoming of you Jon. Stop trying to change the subject > and > > > > answer > > > > > > the question.The question is: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with > > Struts > > > > 1.x > > > > > ?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its > > > > back." > > > > > ~Dakota Jack~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > > > Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is > > > afraid > > > > of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its > > back." > > > ~Dakota Jack~ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is > afraid > > of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris > > > > > > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
