On 28/01/2016 17:54, Francis Bouchard-Boulianne wrote:
Thanks for the answer.
The last question I have on that subject is : Do you have a planned
date for the documentation section 4 (concepts) on the reference
manual [1] ? It is the main documentation we need in order to plan
properly the implementation.
Hi Francis,
the overall idea is that we probably need a couple of months more to
reach out a final consistent state for Syncope 2.0.0 - and this includes
documentation as well.
I will try to give priority to [1]: please watch SYNCOPE-700 in order to
stay in touch with our progresses.
*De :*Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
*Envoyé :* 27 janvier 2016 09:16
Since you are keen to start with 2.0.0-M1, besides the clear advantage
of a smoother migration to 2.0.0, I can see few drawbacks:
1documentation is far from being complete (but I assure that it will
be much better than current wiki pages, once done), and things are
quite different from 1.2, so almost all wiki pages are not applicable
2admin console is still lacking some important features - within this
respect, 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is progressing fast but it is unstable by
definition
3enduser UI is not ready - again, 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is much better
Have you already started working with Syncope? Which distribution are
you using?
We do net have a dev environnment for now. We just packaged Syncope
standalone 2.0.0-M1 and 1.2.7 in two VM so we can play with it. We
will wait for 2.0 since we plan to use it as our primary IDM
environnement and the timeline for 2.0 is in line with our ressources
availabilities...
This is very good to know, thanks.
Regards.
[1] http://syncope.apache.org/docs/reference-guide.html#concepts
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-700
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, CXF committer
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
