Hey Paul Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
Regards Swastik On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the management > network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet. > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: systemvm > > @Stephen > > "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of > the management server. > Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file. > > Thanks > Swastik > > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Stephen > > > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after > > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you > > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to > > figure out how do I find it. > > > > regards > > Swastik > > > > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey @Stephen > >> > >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal > >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection > >> initially. > >> > >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this > >> thread. > >> > >> Outputs: > >> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s > >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > >> state UP qlen 1000 > >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0 > >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > >> state UP qlen 1000 > >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1 > >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > >> state UP qlen 1000 > >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2 > >> > >> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s > >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2 > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43 > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191 > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42 > >> > >> Yes, my storage and management are the same. > >> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n > >> Kernel IP routing table > >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > >> Iface > >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 > >> 0 0 eth2 > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > >> 0 eth1 > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > >> 0 eth2 > >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 > >> 0 eth0 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s.se...@heinlein-support.de> wrote: > >>> Hu! > >>> > >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is > >>> able to connect. > >>> > >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup. > >>> > >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run > >>> > >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh > >>> > >>> also > >>> > >>> ip a s > >>> ip r s > >>> > >>> > >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same > >>> cidr as your management-network? > >>> > >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on > >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs) > >>> > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> > >>> - Stephan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal: > >>>> @Dag > >>>> > >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client > >>>> as false. > >>>> > >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge > >>>> serving both public and private network. > >>>> > >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range > >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip > >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully. > >>>> > >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run > >>>> vm's successfully. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Swastik > >>>> > >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" > >>>> <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > Swastik, > >>>> > > >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather > >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates. > >>>> > > >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring > >>>> > to advanced or basic zone? > >>>> > > >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking? > >>>> > > >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them > >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using > >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the > >>>> > underlying hardware NICs > >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to > >>>> > > >>>> > Regards, > >>>> > Dag Sonstebo > >>>> > Cloud Architect > >>>> > ShapeBlue > >>>> > > >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > @jagdish > >>>> > > >>>> > Yes I was using the same link. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > >>>> > www.shapeblue.com > >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil...@gmail.com > >>>> > > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > Hey Swastik, > >>>> > > > >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but > >>>> > which > >>>> > version > >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using? > >>>> > > > >>>> > > For KVM, download this: > >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat > >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm. > >>>> > > qcow2.bz2 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Regards, > >>>> > > Jagdish Patil > >>>> > > > >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal < > >>>> > mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. > >>>> > Is > >>>> > there any > >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here? > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > @Soundar > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check > >>>> > it again > >>>> > > though. > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bsoundara...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you > >>>> > should > >>>> > able > >>>> > > to > >>>> > > > > access using console window. > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal < > >>>> > > > mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > >> Hey, > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management > >>>> > and > >>>> > host on > >>>> > > same > >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is > >>>> > enabled > >>>> > and up > >>>> > > > and > >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column > >>>> > shows only > >>>> > '-'. > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open > >>>> > console > >>>> > window I get > >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM > >>>> > (accessed > >>>> > > > through > >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh). > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to > >>>> > management > >>>> > > local > >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not > >>>> > able to > >>>> > > connect.). > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying > >>>> > to > >>>> > fetch > >>>> > > > storage > >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage > >>>> > pool > >>>> > through > >>>> > > > "virsh > >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in > >>>> > local > >>>> > storage > >>>> > > > under > >>>> > > > >> agent.properties. > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> Any ideas? > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> Regards > >>>> > > > >> Swastik > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Heinlein Support GmbH > >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin > >>> > >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de > >>> > >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44 > >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19 > >>> > >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht > >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg, > >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
