I suppose it's CDI capable.
https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
Red Hat
: Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group
* @author Gavin King
* @author Pete Muir
* @author Antoine Sabot-Durand
*/
@Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD })
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Documented
@NormalScope
@Inherited
public @interface ApplicationScoped {
}
what I don't understand is how DS look for the interceptors? Can you point
me out the code?
Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if they don't have
@InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered interceptors?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suppose it's CDI capable.
>
> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding. CacheResult is actually
>> exactly a binding for the interceptor.
>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache API ;)
>>
>> Even there is a bridge or something available (
>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not sure if this would work
>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to partial beans.
>>
>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own binding.
>>
>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > uhm...that's not good :S
>> >
>> > the annotation is this one:
>> >
>> > https://static.javadoc.io/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/
>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html
>> >
>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get the interceptor to
>> work?
>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I said I cannot modify the
>> > annotation as it is javax packge)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally CacheResult works but
>> our
>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by a binding
>> > > (InterceptorBinding).
>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc (@Interceptors, @Intercepted,
>> > > @Decorator), is not supported.
>> > >
>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >:
>> > >
>> > > > In must not work without the interceptorbinding. Do you mean that it
>> > does
>> > > > work without?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
>> > > >
>> > > >> can you update your test to remove @InterceptorBinding? and check
>> if
>> > it
>> > > >> works?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is standard so I don't want to
>> > > extend
>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if this is really the
>> problem.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME)
>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD })
>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding
>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor
>> > > >> > {
>> > > >> > }
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I suspect is this @InterceptorBinding....but not 100%
>> sure....what
>> > is
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> > purpose of that?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís Alves <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with the @CacheResult
>> > > interceptor
>> > > >> ;)
>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works?
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is really called ;)
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor declaration of the interceptor
>> for
>> > > the
>> > > >> >>> web app
>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO it should work for the
>> > > cache
>> > > >> as
>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint?
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís Alves <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact is a "copy" of yours
>> > that
>> > > >> logs
>> > > >> >>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > line):
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor
>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor
>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl implements Serializable
>> > > >> >>> > > {
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long serialVersionUID =
>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L;
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject
>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger;
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke
>> > > >> >>> > > public Object interceptIt(InvocationContext
>> > > invocationContext)
>> > > >> >>> throws
>> > > >> >>> > > Exception
>> > > >> >>> > > {
>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :) CustomInterceptorImpl was
>> > called");
>> > > >> >>> > > return invocationContext.proceed();
>> > > >> >>> > > }
>> > > >> >>> > > }
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for service and repo layers):
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
>> xmlns:xsi="
>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors>
>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
>> > > >> >>> > > ...
>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config.
>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class>
>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > </beans>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but not on the
>> @Repository :(
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)...
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom interceptor and check if it's
>> > > invoked?
>> > > >> >>> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use weld-2.0.0.Final or
>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We
>> > > >> have a
>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test as there is something
>> > > broken,
>> > > >> >>> as you
>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted before.
>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you could provide a
>> unittest
>> > > for
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > data
>> > > >> >>> > >> module.
>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by myself.
>> > > >> >>> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
>> [email protected]
>> > >:
>> > > >> >>> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult on
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped
>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository
>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class SomeRepository
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure what I'm doing wrong.
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the CustomBaseRepository for now...but still
>> > > can't
>> > > >> >>> get the
>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my beans.xml:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
>> > > xmlns:xsi="
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep
>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</
>> > > >> >>> > >> class>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> [email protected]
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas,
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if they are on the bean.xml
>> > they
>> > > >> >>> should
>> > > >> >>> > >> works
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't work.
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't had it before)
>> getting:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp
>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class class
>> CustomBaseRepository
>> > > >> >>> failed. Is
>> > > >> >>> > >> it
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid Entity? I got this base class
>> > for
>> > > >> some
>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class CustomBaseRepository <E extends
>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends AbstractEntityRepository<E, K>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> {
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is supposed to work with
>> > the
>> > > >> >>> Repos...
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/apache/delt
>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/
>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/uc008
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> [email protected]>:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell should be supported but
>> only
>> > > via
>> > > >> >>> custom
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding -
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors, @Intercepted and
>> @Decorator"
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that @Repository is actually a
>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding
>> > > >> >>> > >> > and
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI Interceptors applied via
>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors,
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not supported by our proxies!
>> > > >> "...does
>> > > >> >>> it
>> > > >> >>> > >> means
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)?
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected]
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with @ApplicationScoped the interceptor is
>> > not
>> > > >> >>> working
>> > > >> >>> > :(
>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't @Repository methods be
>> > > >> >>> intercepted?
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it should be OK...I guess
>> > it's
>> > > >> like
>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories.
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Luís Alves <
>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi,
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is @Dependent scoped...and seems
>> > that
>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so @CacheResult(cacheName =
>> > > >> "my-cache")
>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :(
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some one proposed that
>> > @Repository
>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should
>> > > >> >>> > >> > be
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if I change them do I
>> have
>> > > to
>> > > >> >>> worry
>> > > >> >>> > >> with
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer is the following:
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public EntityManager get()
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> {
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return entityManager;
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> }
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a different EM for each
>> HTTP
>> > > >> >>> request /
>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() / @Scheduled(cronExpression
>> > > >> ="....")...am I
>> > > >> >>> > >> correct?
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards,
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
