where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I have to import?!
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <luisalve...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup > extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick. > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/ >> spi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class- >> >> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide a patch. >> >> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : >> >> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert on the >> mailing >> > list that want to help? ;) >> > >> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/ >> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax.enterpr >> ise.inject.spi >> > . >> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to (annotationType. >> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need some runtime >> way >> > to check it... >> > >> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on 1.8.2? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically: >> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/blob/master/cache-annotations- >> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/anno >> tations/cdi/ >> > > InterceptorExtension.java >> > > >> > > Just check our code here: >> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/ >> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ >> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLook >> > up.java#L90 >> > > >> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a interceptor >> binding >> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your case should >> > work. >> > > >> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <luisalve...@gmail.com>: >> > > >> > > > This is the reference implementation of the interceptors: >> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI >> > > > They have: >> > > > >> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; >> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >> > > > xsi:schemaLocation=" >> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";> >> > > > <interceptors> >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. >> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. >> > CachePutInterceptor</class> >> > > > >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ >> > class> >> > > > >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept >> or</class> >> > > > </interceptors> >> > > > </beans> >> > > > >> > > > and they have 2files with: >> > > > >> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension >> > > > >> > > > and >> > > > >> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl >> > > > >> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean. >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI: >> > > > > >> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding >> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..) >> > > > > >> > > > > We only support 1) currently. >> > > > > >> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work even a >> normal >> > > CDI >> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the "normal" CDI way. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <luisalve...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/401 >> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:( >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves < >> luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Red Hat >> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King >> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir >> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand >> > > > > > > */ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD }) >> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME) >> > > > > > > @Documented >> > > > > > > @NormalScope >> > > > > > > @Inherited >> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped { >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the interceptors? >> Can >> > > you >> > > > > > point >> > > > > > > me out the code? >> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if they don't >> > have >> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered >> > interceptors? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves < >> > luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > > > >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding. CacheResult >> is >> > > > > actually >> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor. >> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache API ;) >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available ( >> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not sure if >> this >> > > > would >> > > > > > >>> work >> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to partial >> beans. >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own >> binding. >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >> luisalve...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one: >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/ >> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get the >> > > interceptor >> > > > to >> > > > > > >>> work? >> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I said I >> cannot >> > > > > modify >> > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge) >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > > > >>> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally >> CacheResult >> > > > works >> > > > > > >>> but our >> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by a >> binding >> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding). >> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc (@Interceptors, >> > > > > > @Intercepted, >> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > > > >>> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > > >: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the interceptorbinding. Do >> you >> > > mean >> > > > > that >> > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > >>> > does >> > > > > > >>> > > > work without? >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove >> @InterceptorBinding? >> > > and >> > > > > > check >> > > > > > >>> if >> > > > > > >>> > it >> > > > > > >>> > > >> works? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is standard so I >> > > don't >> > > > > want >> > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > >>> > > extend >> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if this is >> really >> > > the >> > > > > > >>> problem. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves < >> > > > > > >>> luisalve...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME) >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD }) >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > { >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > } >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this @InterceptorBinding....but not >> 100% >> > > > > > >>> sure....what >> > > > > > >>> > is >> > > > > > >>> > > >> the >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís Alves < >> > > > > > >>> luisalve...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with the >> > > > @CacheResult >> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor >> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;) >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas >> Andraschko < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is really >> called >> > ;) >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >> > > > > > luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> >: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor declaration of the >> > > > > > interceptor >> > > > > > >>> for >> > > > > > >>> > > the >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO it >> should >> > > work >> > > > > for >> > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > >>> > > cache >> > > > > > >>> > > >> as >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís Alves < >> > > > > > >>> > > luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact is a >> > "copy" >> > > of >> > > > > > yours >> > > > > > >>> > that >> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line): >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl implements >> > > > > > Serializable >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long >> serialVersionUID = >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L; >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger; >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object >> interceptIt(InvocationContext >> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext) >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :) >> > CustomInterceptorImpl >> > > > was >> > > > > > >>> > called"); >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return invocationContext.proceed(); >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for service and >> > repo >> > > > > > layers): >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml >> /ns/javaee >> > " >> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi=" >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// >> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav >> aee/beans_1_0.xsd >> > "> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >> ons.cdi. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ... >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config. >> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but not on >> the >> > > > > > >>> @Repository :( >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)... >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Thomas >> > > Andraschko >> > > > < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom interceptor and >> check >> > > if >> > > > > it's >> > > > > > >>> > > invoked? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use weld-2.0.0.Final or >> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We >> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test as >> there is >> > > > > > something >> > > > > > >>> > > broken, >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted before. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you could >> > > provide a >> > > > > > >>> unittest >> > > > > > >>> > > for >> > > > > > >>> > > >> the >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by myself. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >> > > > > > >>> luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > >: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult on >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class SomeRepository >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure what I'm >> > doing >> > > > > > wrong. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Luís >> Alves >> > < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> luisalve...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the CustomBaseRepository for >> > > > now...but >> > > > > > >>> still >> > > > > > >>> > > can't >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my >> beans.xml: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/ >> > > > xml/ns/javaee" >> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi=" >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche >> ma-instance" >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// >> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/ >> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd >> > > > > "> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. >> > > annotations.cdi. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. >> > > annotations.cdi. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</ >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</ >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Luís >> > Alves >> > > < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas, >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if they are >> on >> > the >> > > > > > >>> bean.xml >> > > > > > >>> > they >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't work. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't had it >> > > before) >> > > > > > >>> getting: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp >> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class class >> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid Entity? I got >> this >> > > > base >> > > > > > >>> class >> > > > > > >>> > for >> > > > > > >>> > > >> some >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class >> CustomBaseRepository >> > > <E >> > > > > > >>> extends >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends >> > AbstractEntityRepository<E, >> > > K> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> { >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is >> supposed >> > to >> > > > work >> > > > > > >>> with >> > > > > > >>> > the >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos... >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, >> Thomas >> > > > > > Andraschko >> > > > > > >>> < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/apache/delt >> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/ >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/ >> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/uc008 >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 Thomas >> > > Andraschko >> > > > < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell should be >> > > > supported >> > > > > > but >> > > > > > >>> only >> > > > > > >>> > > via >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding - >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors, >> @Intercepted >> > and >> > > > > > >>> @Decorator" >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00 Luís >> Alves < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> luisalve...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that @Repository is >> > > > actually >> > > > > a >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI Interceptors >> > > applied >> > > > > via >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors, >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not supported by >> > our >> > > > > > proxies! >> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11 AM, >> Luís >> > > > > Alves < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with @ApplicationScoped the >> > > > > interceptor >> > > > > > >>> is >> > > > > > >>> > not >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :( >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't >> @Repository >> > > > methods >> > > > > > be >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:53 AM, >> > Luís >> > > > > Alves >> > > > > > < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > luisalve...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it should >> be >> > > > OK...I >> > > > > > >>> guess >> > > > > > >>> > it's >> > > > > > >>> > > >> like >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories. >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, >> > Luís >> > > > > > Alves < >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > luisalve...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi, >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is @Dependent >> > > scoped...and >> > > > > > seems >> > > > > > >>> > that >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so >> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName >> > > > > = >> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache") >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :( >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some one >> proposed >> > > that >> > > > > > >>> > @Repository >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if I >> change >> > > them >> > > > > do >> > > > > > I >> > > > > > >>> have >> > > > > > >>> > > to >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer is the >> > > > following: >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public EntityManager get() >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> { >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return entityManager; >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> } >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a >> different EM >> > > for >> > > > > > each >> > > > > > >>> HTTP >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request / >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() / >> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression >> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct? >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards, >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
