found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.impl.invocation.InterceptorLookup on version 1.8.0
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I have to > import?! > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup >> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick. >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s >>> pi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class- >>> >>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide a patch. >>> >>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : >>> >>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert on the >>> mailing >>> > list that want to help? ;) >>> > >>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/ >>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax.enterpr >>> ise.inject.spi >>> > . >>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to (annotationType. >>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need some runtime >>> way >>> > to check it... >>> > >>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on 1.8.2? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically: >>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/blob/master/cache-annotations- >>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/anno >>> tations/cdi/ >>> > > InterceptorExtension.java >>> > > >>> > > Just check our code here: >>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/ >>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ >>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLook >>> > up.java#L90 >>> > > >>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a interceptor >>> binding >>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your case should >>> > work. >>> > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>: >>> > > >>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the interceptors: >>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI >>> > > > They have: >>> > > > >>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; >>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation=" >>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";> >>> > > > <interceptors> >>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. >>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. >>> > CachePutInterceptor</class> >>> > > > >>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ >>> > class> >>> > > > >>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept >>> or</class> >>> > > > </interceptors> >>> > > > </beans> >>> > > > >>> > > > and they have 2files with: >>> > > > >>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension >>> > > > >>> > > > and >>> > > > >>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl >>> > > > >>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >>> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding >>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > We only support 1) currently. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work even a >>> normal >>> > > CDI >>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the "normal" CDI >>> way. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/401 >>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:( >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves < >>> [email protected] >>> > > >>> > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Red Hat >>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King >>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir >>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand >>> > > > > > > */ >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD }) >>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME) >>> > > > > > > @Documented >>> > > > > > > @NormalScope >>> > > > > > > @Inherited >>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped { >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > } >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the interceptors? >>> Can >>> > > you >>> > > > > > point >>> > > > > > > me out the code? >>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if they don't >>> > have >>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered >>> > interceptors? >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable. >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding. CacheResult >>> is >>> > > > > actually >>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor. >>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache API ;) >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available ( >>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not sure if >>> this >>> > > > would >>> > > > > > >>> work >>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to partial >>> beans. >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own >>> binding. >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >>> [email protected]>: >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one: >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/ >>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get the >>> > > interceptor >>> > > > to >>> > > > > > >>> work? >>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I said I >>> cannot >>> > > > > modify >>> > > > > > >>> the >>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge) >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally >>> CacheResult >>> > > > works >>> > > > > > >>> but our >>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by a >>> binding >>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding). >>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc (@Interceptors, >>> > > > > > @Intercepted, >>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko < >>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > >: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the interceptorbinding. Do >>> you >>> > > mean >>> > > > > that >>> > > > > > >>> it >>> > > > > > >>> > does >>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove >>> @InterceptorBinding? >>> > > and >>> > > > > > check >>> > > > > > >>> if >>> > > > > > >>> > it >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is standard so >>> I >>> > > don't >>> > > > > want >>> > > > > > >>> to >>> > > > > > >>> > > extend >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if this is >>> really >>> > > the >>> > > > > > >>> problem. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME) >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD }) >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > { >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > } >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this @InterceptorBinding....but not >>> 100% >>> > > > > > >>> sure....what >>> > > > > > >>> > is >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with the >>> > > > @CacheResult >>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;) >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas >>> Andraschko < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is really >>> called >>> > ;) >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >>> > > > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> >: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor declaration of >>> the >>> > > > > > interceptor >>> > > > > > >>> for >>> > > > > > >>> > > the >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO it >>> should >>> > > work >>> > > > > for >>> > > > > > >>> the >>> > > > > > >>> > > cache >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact is a >>> > "copy" >>> > > of >>> > > > > > yours >>> > > > > > >>> > that >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line): >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl >>> implements >>> > > > > > Serializable >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long >>> serialVersionUID = >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L; >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger; >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object >>> interceptIt(InvocationContext >>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext) >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :) >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl >>> > > > was >>> > > > > > >>> > called"); >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return invocationContext.proceed(); >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for service and >>> > repo >>> > > > > > layers): >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml >>> /ns/javaee >>> > " >>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi=" >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// >>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav >>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd >>> > "> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >>> ons.cdi. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ... >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config. >>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but not on >>> the >>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :( >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)... >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Thomas >>> > > Andraschko >>> > > > < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom interceptor and >>> check >>> > > if >>> > > > > it's >>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use weld-2.0.0.Final or >>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test as >>> there is >>> > > > > > something >>> > > > > > >>> > > broken, >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted before. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you could >>> > > provide a >>> > > > > > >>> unittest >>> > > > > > >>> > > for >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by myself. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > >: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult on >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class SomeRepository >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure what I'm >>> > doing >>> > > > > > wrong. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Luís >>> Alves >>> > < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the CustomBaseRepository for >>> > > > now...but >>> > > > > > >>> still >>> > > > > > >>> > > can't >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my >>> beans.xml: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/ >>> > > > xml/ns/javaee" >>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi=" >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche >>> ma-instance" >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// >>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/ >>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd >>> > > > > "> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. >>> > > annotations.cdi. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. >>> > > annotations.cdi. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</ >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</ >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Luís >>> > Alves >>> > > < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas, >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if they are >>> on >>> > the >>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml >>> > > > > > >>> > they >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't work. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't had it >>> > > before) >>> > > > > > >>> getting: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class class >>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid Entity? I got >>> this >>> > > > base >>> > > > > > >>> class >>> > > > > > >>> > for >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class >>> CustomBaseRepository >>> > > <E >>> > > > > > >>> extends >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends >>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E, >>> > > K> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> { >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is >>> supposed >>> > to >>> > > > work >>> > > > > > >>> with >>> > > > > > >>> > the >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos... >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, >>> Thomas >>> > > > > > Andraschko >>> > > > > > >>> < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/apache/delt >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/ >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/ >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/uc008 >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 Thomas >>> > > Andraschko >>> > > > < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> [email protected]>: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell should be >>> > > > supported >>> > > > > > but >>> > > > > > >>> only >>> > > > > > >>> > > via >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding - >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors, >>> @Intercepted >>> > and >>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator" >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00 Luís >>> Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that @Repository is >>> > > > actually >>> > > > > a >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI Interceptors >>> > > applied >>> > > > > via >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors, >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not supported >>> by >>> > our >>> > > > > > proxies! >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11 AM, >>> Luís >>> > > > > Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with @ApplicationScoped the >>> > > > > interceptor >>> > > > > > >>> is >>> > > > > > >>> > not >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :( >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't >>> @Repository >>> > > > methods >>> > > > > > be >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:53 AM, >>> > Luís >>> > > > > Alves >>> > > > > > < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it should >>> be >>> > > > OK...I >>> > > > > > >>> guess >>> > > > > > >>> > it's >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories. >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:44 >>> AM, >>> > Luís >>> > > > > > Alves < >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi, >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is @Dependent >>> > > scoped...and >>> > > > > > seems >>> > > > > > >>> > that >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so >>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName >>> > > > > = >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache") >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :( >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some one >>> proposed >>> > > that >>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if I >>> change >>> > > them >>> > > > > do >>> > > > > > I >>> > > > > > >>> have >>> > > > > > >>> > > to >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer is the >>> > > > following: >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public EntityManager get() >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> { >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return entityManager; >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> } >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a >>> different EM >>> > > for >>> > > > > > each >>> > > > > > >>> HTTP >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request / >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() / >>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct? >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards, >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
