seems to work:
org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@59fae308
not sure the cache is actually working but I think it's not related with
DS. If possible release a version with the fix:
@ApplicationScoped
@Specializes
public class CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup extends
InterceptorLookup
{
@Override
protected void addInterceptorBindings(BeanManager beanManager,
ArrayList<Annotation> bindings,
Annotation[] declaredAnnotations)
{
for (Annotation annotation : declaredAnnotations)
{
if (bindings.contains(annotation))
{
continue;
}
Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType =
annotation.annotationType();
* if (**beanManager.isInterceptorBinding(annotationType))*
{
bindings.add(annotation);
}
if (beanManager.isStereotype(annotationType)) *///fun part is
that here is well done ;)*
{
for (Annotation subAnnotation :
annotationType.getDeclaredAnnotations())
{
if (bindings.contains(subAnnotation))
{
continue;
}
if
(subAnnotation.annotationType().isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))
{
bindings.add(subAnnotation);
}
}
}
}
}
Thanks very much Thomas :)
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote:
> found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.impl.invocation.InterceptorLookup
> on version 1.8.0
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I have to
>> import?!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup
>>> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s
>>>> pi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class-
>>>>
>>>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide a patch.
>>>>
>>>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
>>>>
>>>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert on the
>>>> mailing
>>>> > list that want to help? ;)
>>>> >
>>>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/
>>>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax.enterpr
>>>> ise.inject.spi
>>>> > .
>>>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to (annotationType.
>>>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need some
>>>> runtime way
>>>> > to check it...
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on 1.8.2?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically:
>>>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/blob/master/cache-annotations-
>>>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/anno
>>>> tations/cdi/
>>>> > > InterceptorExtension.java
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Just check our code here:
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/
>>>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/
>>>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLook
>>>> > up.java#L90
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a interceptor
>>>> binding
>>>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your case
>>>> should
>>>> > work.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the interceptors:
>>>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI
>>>> > > > They have:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
>>>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation="
>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";>
>>>> > > > <interceptors>
>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
>>>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
>>>> > CachePutInterceptor</class>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterce
>>>> ptor</
>>>> > class>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept
>>>> or</class>
>>>> > > > </interceptors>
>>>> > > > </beans>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > and they have 2files with:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding
>>>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..)
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > We only support 1) currently.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work even a
>>>> normal
>>>> > > CDI
>>>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the "normal" CDI
>>>> way.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/401
>>>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:(
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable.
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Red Hat
>>>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King
>>>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir
>>>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>>> > > > > > > */
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD })
>>>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME)
>>>> > > > > > > @Documented
>>>> > > > > > > @NormalScope
>>>> > > > > > > @Inherited
>>>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped {
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > }
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the
>>>> interceptors? Can
>>>> > > you
>>>> > > > > > point
>>>> > > > > > > me out the code?
>>>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if they
>>>> don't
>>>> > have
>>>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered
>>>> > interceptors?
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves <
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable.
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding.
>>>> CacheResult is
>>>> > > > > actually
>>>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor.
>>>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache API ;)
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available (
>>>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not sure
>>>> if this
>>>> > > > would
>>>> > > > > > >>> work
>>>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to partial
>>>> beans.
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own
>>>> binding.
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one:
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/
>>>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get the
>>>> > > interceptor
>>>> > > > to
>>>> > > > > > >>> work?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I said I
>>>> cannot
>>>> > > > > modify
>>>> > > > > > >>> the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge)
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally
>>>> CacheResult
>>>> > > > works
>>>> > > > > > >>> but our
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by a
>>>> binding
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding).
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc
>>>> (@Interceptors,
>>>> > > > > > @Intercepted,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the interceptorbinding. Do
>>>> you
>>>> > > mean
>>>> > > > > that
>>>> > > > > > >>> it
>>>> > > > > > >>> > does
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove
>>>> @InterceptorBinding?
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > > > > check
>>>> > > > > > >>> if
>>>> > > > > > >>> > it
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is standard
>>>> so I
>>>> > > don't
>>>> > > > > want
>>>> > > > > > >>> to
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > extend
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if this is
>>>> really
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > > > > >>> problem.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME)
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD })
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > {
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > }
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this @InterceptorBinding....but not
>>>> 100%
>>>> > > > > > >>> sure....what
>>>> > > > > > >>> > is
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with the
>>>> > > > @CacheResult
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;)
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas
>>>> Andraschko <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is really
>>>> called
>>>> > ;)
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
>>>> > > > > > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> >:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor declaration of
>>>> the
>>>> > > > > > interceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> for
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO it
>>>> should
>>>> > > work
>>>> > > > > for
>>>> > > > > > >>> the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > cache
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís Alves
>>>> <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact is a
>>>> > "copy"
>>>> > > of
>>>> > > > > > yours
>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line):
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl
>>>> implements
>>>> > > > > > Serializable
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long
>>>> serialVersionUID =
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L;
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger;
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object
>>>> interceptIt(InvocationContext
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext)
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :)
>>>> > CustomInterceptorImpl
>>>> > > > was
>>>> > > > > > >>> > called");
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return invocationContext.proceed();
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for service
>>>> and
>>>> > repo
>>>> > > > > > layers):
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml
>>>> /ns/javaee
>>>> > "
>>>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi="
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
>>>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav
>>>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd
>>>> > ">
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
>>>> ons.cdi.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but not
>>>> on the
>>>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :(
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)...
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Thomas
>>>> > > Andraschko
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom interceptor and
>>>> check
>>>> > > if
>>>> > > > > it's
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use weld-2.0.0.Final or
>>>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test as
>>>> there is
>>>> > > > > > something
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > broken,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted before.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you could
>>>> > > provide a
>>>> > > > > > >>> unittest
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > for
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by myself.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > >:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult on
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class SomeRepository
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure what
>>>> I'm
>>>> > doing
>>>> > > > > > wrong.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Luís
>>>> Alves
>>>> > <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the CustomBaseRepository for
>>>> > > > now...but
>>>> > > > > > >>> still
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > can't
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my
>>>> beans.xml:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/
>>>> > > > xml/ns/javaee"
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi="
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
>>>> ma-instance"
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
>>>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/
>>>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd
>>>> > > > > ">
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.
>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.
>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Luís
>>>> > Alves
>>>> > > <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if they
>>>> are on
>>>> > the
>>>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml
>>>> > > > > > >>> > they
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't work.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't had it
>>>> > > before)
>>>> > > > > > >>> getting:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class class
>>>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid Entity? I
>>>> got this
>>>> > > > base
>>>> > > > > > >>> class
>>>> > > > > > >>> > for
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class
>>>> CustomBaseRepository
>>>> > > <E
>>>> > > > > > >>> extends
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends
>>>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E,
>>>> > > K>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> {
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is
>>>> supposed
>>>> > to
>>>> > > > work
>>>> > > > > > >>> with
>>>> > > > > > >>> > the
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos...
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM,
>>>> Thomas
>>>> > > > > > Andraschko
>>>> > > > > > >>> <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/apache/delt
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/uc008
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 Thomas
>>>> > > Andraschko
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> [email protected]>:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell should be
>>>> > > > supported
>>>> > > > > > but
>>>> > > > > > >>> only
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > via
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding -
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors,
>>>> @Intercepted
>>>> > and
>>>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator"
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00 Luís
>>>> Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that @Repository
>>>> is
>>>> > > > actually
>>>> > > > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI
>>>> Interceptors
>>>> > > applied
>>>> > > > > via
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not supported
>>>> by
>>>> > our
>>>> > > > > > proxies!
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11
>>>> AM, Luís
>>>> > > > > Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with @ApplicationScoped
>>>> the
>>>> > > > > interceptor
>>>> > > > > > >>> is
>>>> > > > > > >>> > not
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :(
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't
>>>> @Repository
>>>> > > > methods
>>>> > > > > > be
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:53
>>>> AM,
>>>> > Luís
>>>> > > > > Alves
>>>> > > > > > <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it
>>>> should be
>>>> > > > OK...I
>>>> > > > > > >>> guess
>>>> > > > > > >>> > it's
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories.
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:44
>>>> AM,
>>>> > Luís
>>>> > > > > > Alves <
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is @Dependent
>>>> > > scoped...and
>>>> > > > > > seems
>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so
>>>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName
>>>> > > > > =
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache")
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :(
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some one
>>>> proposed
>>>> > > that
>>>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if I
>>>> change
>>>> > > them
>>>> > > > > do
>>>> > > > > > I
>>>> > > > > > >>> have
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer is the
>>>> > > > following:
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public EntityManager
>>>> get()
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> {
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return entityManager;
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> }
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a
>>>> different EM
>>>> > > for
>>>> > > > > > each
>>>> > > > > > >>> HTTP
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request /
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() /
>>>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct?
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards,
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
