Thanks for the feedback. Some custom responses are below, plus these
updates:

   - If you install the Windows SDK through the installer and point to it
   from FlashBuilder 4.7, it works like a charm.
   - If you install the Mac SDK, however, FlashBuilder 4.7 will compile
   with it but won't launch the application in debug mode (didn't try
   non-debug mode at the time, sorry), saying it can't connect to the
   debugger. To solve this, you need to run the (for us newly-discovered)
   ide/constructFlexSDK.sh script.
   - The script above creates, among others, a bunch of Mac aliases. If you
   try to commit these in svn, it will complain. If you delete the aliases, it
   will still complain and now the app won't run. So I conclude developers are
   meant to run these scripts locally and not commit them.
   - After many hours spent trying to integrate the frameworks, we settled
   for having two separate ones in parallel. We are also realising that
   storing the SDK in svn is not such a good idea. We'll hopefully move to it
   into maven soon.



On 13 May 2014 20:50, Christofer Dutz wrote:

> Most of the old Adobe ones had lnx, mac and win directories in the runtime
> directories.
> As far as I remember there weren't any "win" or "mac" versions of the SDK
> ... only the Air SDKs had platform versions.
>

​I think you're right, Chris. From what I remember it's not long since ​the
installer started bundling the Flex SDK with the AIR SDK. Before we used to
have to merge them manually, so it's much easier now. However, for various
reasons it's now more difficult to merge Mac and Windows AIR SDKs.



> Von: Alex Harui

Did the Adobe Flex SDKs ship like this or were there Mac and Win versions?
>

​There are Mac and Win versions of the SDK installer​, which install
slightly different versions of the SDKs. For instance, adl on Mac and
adl.exe on Win.

>
> On 5/13/14 1:26 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Would also like something like this ... this way the mavenizer could
> >mavenize all runtimes in one pass :-)
>

​We're using ​ant to build the application, and my maven-fu is very weak,
but indeed it sounds like it would simplify things.

Reply via email to