On 4/3/07, Gunter Ohrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Resent, the first mail was from the wrong From address.)
Am Montag, 2. April 2007 23:33 schrieb euvitudo:
> > Depending on your configuration (bdb vs. fsfs repository) and your
> AFAIK, it's bdb. The LaCie was formatted as ext3 with dir_index (using
> Where I see this problem occur is in the size of the
> transaction/.../rev file for the given svn transaction. The rev file
Sounds like an FSFS repository to me.
You are correct. I didn't realize that it was (I'm still relatively new to
svn). After learning a bit more about it, I seem to like the idea behind
fsfs, so I'll probably continue to use it for a while.
> becomes large. Once it gets beyong 130M or so, disk access becomes
> much slower.
What does "slower" mean? I already committed chunks a few GB in size a few
times and did not notice a major slow down, however I only have a
relatively low-throughput connection to my SVN server. (No LAN.)
Well, as I wrote to Phil just a minute ago, the issue was my use and
configuration of ext3. Converting to reiserfs made a lot of difference, due
to the small file issue (including the all the md5s files that fsvs is
writing).
> Once it reached 2GB, there was an access problem, and
As Philipp wrote, this is probably caused by apr libs without large file
support, I also had this problem once on an older installation.
I'm a bit confused, however, as you use pretty recent versions, I'd had
imagined that large file support would have been enabled by default for
some time now...
Yeah, I don't quite understand this, as Gentoo doesn't have the large file
support disabled.
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
