On 24/09/2012 at 16:48, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We need to keep it with the > needed options for the 90% "average" users and not for those that are in > the last 10% or even those in the last 1% or less users that do so > complex work that the "average" user could not figure out why this is > being done or even how to do such a thing even with the needed > documentation. I totally disagree. If user is unable to do something he wants with open documentation, then this is documentation fault. It should be fixed (made clear, verbose, use screenshots or anything), not feature should be disabled. There are many ways to speed up opening of programs. Some features may be delayed or loaded on request. Application can be modularized - core features are loaded by default, other are loaded only if user wants them (take a look at LaTeX, GNU R, Miranda (instant messenger), even Mozilla Firefox to some avail). *Removing* features is total no-go, because it will drive away these users who need them. And I don't think that LO is application only for 90% of it's current users. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
