if you just want to use opensource sw, then sge6.2u5p2, you may consider using rockscluster 5.4.3 that has rpm if you want support then go with oge or univa, it seems oracle may not be moving things forward with oge. in a meeting by univa it is clear that univa want to move ge forward and also make $ so it will make some src available but no free binary now a day every open source DRM have commerical party that want to make $ torque, maui, slurm, ge etc So take you pick as for bug, very sw has bug, sge codes are quite complex, hope that someone somewhere will take it to more morden and simpler and more module way. my 2c
Sent from my iPad Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D On Sep 8, 2011, at 5:54, William Hay <[email protected]> wrote: > We're currently running 6.2u3 on our cluster. We should really > upgrade this to something more current. In particular we want to move > to something with > support for the -tc and -binding options to qsub. While in theory we > could just grab 6.2u5 which has the features that we need right now > we'd like > to move to a version with forward momentum. The question is which version? > > We had Fritz Ferstl in yesterday to explain Univa's commercial > offering and what they offer over and > above the common core. Fritz also explained that contrary to our > experience Grid engine is really > buggy, unstable and hard to debug so we really need a support contract > with them:) > > Does anyone want to sing the praises and explain the advantage of the > various other variants of Grid engine out there > (Univa's open core, Oracle Grid Engine, Open Grid Scheduler, the Love > child variant or even using some linux distro > which includes an SGE variant)? > > > > William > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
