On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:11 PM, David Dawson < david.daw...@simplicityitself.com> wrote:
> I would vote 2. > > Actually, i would vote 3) abandon 2.6 immediately. > We identified a few major things that were broken in the previous alpha release of 2.6 but only due to trivial packaging issues, hence the plan to do one more release. Also, Jesper identified a few things that can easily be aligned from 3.0 in a very short period of time. I am happy to wait for his thumbs up before proceeding. I am also keen on releasing another alpha of 3.0 at the same time as the 2.6 alpha. I believe that will make our life easier when answering future support-oriented questions about 2.6 on the mailing list going forward. So, doing one more alpha release of 2.6 has minimal impact on 3.0 timing and leaves us in as clean a state as can be hoped for when retiring a previously planned branch. Cheers, Paul.
