I too vote for option 3. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com > wrote:
> I vote for option 3 > > Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 18:46, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> a > écrit : > >> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 14:53 -0400, Keith Suderman wrote: >> > > >> […] >> > How about an option #4. If you are planning to do one more release of >> 2.6.0 >> > anyway just drop the 'alpha' from the name and announce that it is the >> first >> > and last 2.6.x release expected. >> > >> >> I think this would be a bad idea. We haven't had any beta releases, nor RC >> releases. To jump to a final release strikes me as failure of proper >> process. >> >> Also leaving 2.6.0-alpha-3 as the last 2.6 release clearly indicates it >> is a >> retired version series. It also leaves it open much better for someone to >> pick >> it up should they so wish. >> >> -- >> Russel. >> =========================================== >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 >> 41 Buckmaster Road >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=41+Buckmaster+Road&entry=gmail&source=g> >> m: +44 7770 465 077 >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk >> > -- Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.
