I vote for option 3 Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 18:46, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> a écrit :
> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 14:53 -0400, Keith Suderman wrote: > > > > […] > > How about an option #4. If you are planning to do one more release of > 2.6.0 > > anyway just drop the 'alpha' from the name and announce that it is the > first > > and last 2.6.x release expected. > > > > I think this would be a bad idea. We haven't had any beta releases, nor RC > releases. To jump to a final release strikes me as failure of proper > process. > > Also leaving 2.6.0-alpha-3 as the last 2.6 release clearly indicates it is > a > retired version series. It also leaves it open much better for someone to > pick > it up should they so wish. > > -- > Russel. > =========================================== > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk >
