>> >Therefore IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary on IPv6 (good for
>> >SSL!).
>> I thought IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary due to
>> HTTP 1.1 Host: header. is my understanding correct?
oops, I wrote it backwards - IPless virtual hosting already works fine
with host: header, then why do we need to avoid IPless virtual hosting
as you suggested?
>IMHO: this is IPless virtual hosting - or am I wrong what I have configured
>since some years on my webservers?
so which side are you proposing to use?
- IPless virtual hosting using host:
- non-IPless virtual hosting using extra IP addresses
itojun
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
