At 23:23 01.02.2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Perhaps not a main answer to your questions but keep in mind (or get it as
> >new information) that you have about 2^46 local self defineable IPv6
> >addresses per subnet available. With an IPv6-enabled Apache it's possible
> >to bind each virtual host on its own IPv6 address i.e.
> >www1.domain1.com : routingprefix:0:0:0:1
> >www2.domain1.com : routingprefix:0:0:0:2
> >a.s.o.
> >
> >only thing is that DNS is well defined for IPv6 addresses.
> >
> >Therefore IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary on IPv6 (good for
> >SSL!).
>
> I thought IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary due to
> HTTP 1.1 Host: header. is my understanding correct?
IMHO: this is IPless virtual hosting - or am I wrong what I have configured
since some years on my webservers?
IPless virtual hosting only works with HTTP 1.1, HTTP 1.0 clients run into
problems on such sites/IP-addresses.
The server takes the "host: " header and selects the matching virtual
webserver (Apache: ServerName and ServerAlias).
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
