At 23:55 01.02.2001, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> >> >Therefore IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary on IPv6 (good for
> >> >SSL!).
> >> I thought IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary due to
> >> HTTP 1.1 Host: header. is my understanding correct?
>
> oops, I wrote it backwards - IPless virtual hosting already works
> fine
> with host: header, then why do we need to avoid IPless virtual
> hosting
> as you suggested?
>
> >IMHO: this is IPless virtual hosting - or am I wrong what I have configured
> >since some years on my webservers?
>
> so which side are you proposing to use?
> - IPless virtual hosting using host:
> - non-IPless virtual hosting using extra IP addresses
For IPv6 the second one, because there is no longer need for IPv4less
virtual hosting. Also like another guy mentioned, SSL hosting needs a fix
IP per domain (because of the encryption starts before sending the "host:"
field).
BTW: Accounting would be much easier also.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
