--On Monday, January 21, 2002 11:03:19 PM +0100 Jollino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice the 6to4 thing is ;) I have read in a howto (Peter
> Bieringer's, sorry if I incorrectly spelt the name),
It's well.
> though, that
> there's no way to get reverse dns on the 2.0.0.2.ip6.int since the
> guys at ip6.int haven't assigned the block to anyone.
Did I really wrote this - oops, where?
> Has anyone
> got any updates about it?
We should extend the question, because *.ip6.int should be moved (or
better copied) to *.ip6.arpa :
why is complete 6bone still only available on *.ip6.int, while
Registries already listed on *.ip6.arpa?
See here for more and compare:
dig AXFR ip6.arpa. @NS.RIPE.NET. >ip6.arpa.db
dig AXFR ip6.int. @imag.imag.fr. >ip6.int.db
> Right now I'm using a /64 from he.net,
> but it's really slow (my ipv4 ping to the tunnel endpoint is
> something like 400 ms), while with the 6to4 technique I'm just 120
> ms from most v6 hosts (at least from the ones here in Italy). I
> haven't switched yet because I'd like to know whether there's any
> short-term hope to map addresses in the 6to4 to hostnames :)
Problem will be that the nibble format don't always match the ISP's
IPv4 address space. A lot of CNAME records have to be generated, like
in IPv4 today - therefore no real reason why not...
...if the IPv4 address you're using is a static one assigned by a
local ISP to you and it's registered to you.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
