-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 7 2002 15:08 -0400, Aaron Angel wrote:

> Except that ip6.arpa has a completely difference format for entries...

Weren't bitlabels and the A6 and DNAME record types changed to
experimental status? Granted, it was only an Internet-Draft as far as
I have seen, and maybe someone knows more than I do about that.

I can't find that particular I-D right now, though.


Michael Kj�rling

- -- 
Michael Kj�rling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8sUTNKqN7/Ypw4z4RAsSzAKCHNK7x54kqDF9zEI+IsrE99/oNrACg0JmR
BxoBtW4DeoCBvK/gDV5xLGk=
=X4ZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to