thats cool.  What router is that?  Are you on xDSL or Cable? What
geography?
this is a good list and good discussion for sure.
thanks
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:09 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> 
> I have protocol 41 allowed to pass on my router.
> 
> Bound, Jim wrote:
> 
> >Thats where Teredo can help otherwise you need to be able to 
> get inside
> >your router to permit protocol 41 and encap Ipv6, which some 
> hard core
> >operator type engineers I know have done.  This is a huge problem for
> >many. It basically is a bummer.
> >
> >/jim 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:57 PM
> >>To: Bound, Jim; [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> >>
> >>I don't know.  My linux router works fine, say going to 
> kame.net, or 
> >>pinging it via ipv6.  Not sure how to handle my inside behind 
> >>a firewall 
> >>with nat clients having private ips (10.0.10.x).
> >>
> >>Bound, Jim wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>If you have a valid IPv6 prefix why use 6to4 addreses at 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>all?  Why not
> >>    
> >>
> >>>just deprecate 6to4 and move to IPv6 addresses directly?
> >>>
> >>>thanks
> >>>/jim 
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> >>>>Behalf Of Fredrik Tolf
> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:38 AM
> >>>>To: Michael Banta
> >>>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> >>>>Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> >>>>
> >>>>On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 04:41 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>I am aware of a full ip address, just figured I would spare 
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>you the full 
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>address since it is not pertenant to the question.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I keep reading that with 6to4 addresses, they are supposed 
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>to start with 
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>2002: prefixes so that autoconfiguration can take place 
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>with the clients.
> >>>>
> >>>>6to4 address are something quite different from a block 
> >>>>provided through
> >>>>a tunnel. a 2001 address is a "real" IPv6 address -- that is, 
> >>>>a part of
> >>>>the IPv6 Internet with no IPv4 dependencies.
> >>>>
> >>>>6to4 addresses (i.e. those starting with 2002), on the 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>other hand, are
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>part of the IPv4-to-IPv6 migration plan. If you have a globally
> >>>>aggregatable IPv4 address (i.e. an IPv4 address that anyone 
> >>>>on the IPv4
> >>>>internet can send packets to, such as _not_ a part of the 
> >>>>192.168.0.0/24
> >>>>blocks), you are, with 6to4, automatically given a /48 
> IPv6 subnet.
> >>>>
> >>>>I know I haven't really explained this very well at this 
> >>>>point, so I'll
> >>>>try with an example. I'm using 6to4. I have a static IPv4 address,
> >>>>82.182.133.20. Written in hexadecimal, that is 52.b6.85.14. 
> >>>>Using that,
> >>>>I can construct my automatic 6to4 subnet: 
> >>>>2002:52b6:8414::/48. I, too am
> >>>>using a Linux router with radvd, and the computer I'm 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>typing this from
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>has gotten the 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>address2002:52b6:8514:200:20c:76ff:fe3b:a3f4. The nice
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>thing with this is that I need no tunnel provider. The bad 
> >>>>thing is, of
> >>>>course, that it depends on IPv4.
> >>>>
> >>>>The way 6to4 works is that when my router detects an outgoing IPv6
> >>>>packet, it first checks the destination address. If it starts 
> >>>>with 2002,
> >>>>it rolls the packet inside an IPv4 packet, checks bits 16 
> >>>>through 48 in
> >>>>the destination address, and put those in the IPv4 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>destination address
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>field. For example, when communicating with my friend, 
> who also uses
> >>>>6to4 and has the IPv4 address 213.132.111.101, I send a 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>packet to her
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>IPv6 address, 2002:d584:6f65::1. My router extracts 
> >>>>d584:6f65, which is
> >>>>213.132.111.101 in hexadecimal, and puts that in the IPv4 packet's
> >>>>destination address field, puts the IPv6 packet as the IPv4 
> >>>>payload, and
> >>>>sends the packet. When her computer picks it up, it 
> unwraps the IPv6
> >>>>packet and uses it.
> >>>>When communicating with a non-6to4 address, my router sends 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>it, again
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>wrapped in an IPv4 packet, to a IPv4-to-IPv6 router on 
> the Internet.
> >>>>Many ISPs support the anycast address 192.88.99.1, which 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>always means
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>"the closest IPv4-to-IPv6 router". When a non-6to4 host 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>wishes to send
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>v6 packets to me, it just sends them normally and the 
> IPv6 Internet
> >>>>backbone will route them to the closest IPv6-to-IPv4 router, 
> >>>>which will
> >>>>wrap their package in an IPv4 packet, check the IPv6 
> >>>>destination address
> >>>>(2002:52b6:8514:X) and calculate the proper IPv4 destination 
> >>>>address (my
> >>>>82.182.133.20 address) from that, and send it to me over 
> >>>>IPv4. My router
> >>>>will then unwrap it when it gets it, and forward it over 
> my internal
> >>>>IPv6 network.
> >>>>
> >>>>So as you see, 6to4 addresses are something quite 
> different from the
> >>>>2001::/48 block that you got from your tunnel provider.
> >>>>
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>The /48 was given to me by the provider.  I am aware of the 
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>addresses 
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>construction, just can't figure out how to get the clients 
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>to connect 
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>through the router.
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>I still don't really understand what your actual problem 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>is, after all
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>this.
> >>>>
> >>>>Hope this helps.
> >>>>Fredrik Tolf
> >>>>
> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>---------
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> >>>>Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> >Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to