On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:17:16PM -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> It is a linux router running MDK10.1.  It is a cable connection with a 
> static ip.  Dayton, OH.
> 
> I am soo close!  Just can't get there.
> 

Michael,

Let me know off-list if you want a static /48 assignment and a tunnel, 
if you want something more advanced than a 6to4 access. I have a tunneling
POP at Chicago that should be fairly close from you.

-J


> Thanks
> 
> Bound, Jim wrote:
> 
> >thats cool.  What router is that?  Are you on xDSL or Cable? What
> >geography?
> >this is a good list and good discussion for sure.
> >thanks
> >/jim 
> >
> > 
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:09 PM
> >>To: Bound, Jim
> >>Cc: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> >>
> >>I have protocol 41 allowed to pass on my router.
> >>
> >>Bound, Jim wrote:
> >>
> >>   
> >>
> >>>Thats where Teredo can help otherwise you need to be able to 
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>get inside
> >>   
> >>
> >>>your router to permit protocol 41 and encap Ipv6, which some 
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>hard core
> >>   
> >>
> >>>operator type engineers I know have done.  This is a huge problem for
> >>>many. It basically is a bummer.
> >>>
> >>>/jim 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >>>>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:57 PM
> >>>>To: Bound, Jim; [email protected]
> >>>>Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> >>>>
> >>>>I don't know.  My linux router works fine, say going to 
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>kame.net, or 
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>pinging it via ipv6.  Not sure how to handle my inside behind 
> >>>>a firewall 
> >>>>with nat clients having private ips (10.0.10.x).
> >>>>
> >>>>Bound, Jim wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>If you have a valid IPv6 prefix why use 6to4 addreses at 
> >>>>>    
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         
> >>>>>
> >>>>all?  Why not
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>just deprecate 6to4 and move to IPv6 addresses directly?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>thanks
> >>>>>/jim 
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> >>>>>>Behalf Of Fredrik Tolf
> >>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:38 AM
> >>>>>>To: Michael Banta
> >>>>>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> >>>>>>Subject: Re: 6to4 question
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 04:41 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I am aware of a full ip address, just figured I would spare 
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>you the full 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>address since it is not pertenant to the question.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I keep reading that with 6to4 addresses, they are supposed 
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>to start with 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>2002: prefixes so that autoconfiguration can take place 
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>with the clients.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>6to4 address are something quite different from a block 
> >>>>>>provided through
> >>>>>>a tunnel. a 2001 address is a "real" IPv6 address -- that is, 
> >>>>>>a part of
> >>>>>>the IPv6 Internet with no IPv4 dependencies.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>6to4 addresses (i.e. those starting with 2002), on the 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>other hand, are
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>part of the IPv4-to-IPv6 migration plan. If you have a globally
> >>>>>>aggregatable IPv4 address (i.e. an IPv4 address that anyone 
> >>>>>>on the IPv4
> >>>>>>internet can send packets to, such as _not_ a part of the 
> >>>>>>192.168.0.0/24
> >>>>>>blocks), you are, with 6to4, automatically given a /48 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>IPv6 subnet.
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>I know I haven't really explained this very well at this 
> >>>>>>point, so I'll
> >>>>>>try with an example. I'm using 6to4. I have a static IPv4 address,
> >>>>>>82.182.133.20. Written in hexadecimal, that is 52.b6.85.14. 
> >>>>>>Using that,
> >>>>>>I can construct my automatic 6to4 subnet: 
> >>>>>>2002:52b6:8414::/48. I, too am
> >>>>>>using a Linux router with radvd, and the computer I'm 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>typing this from
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>has gotten the 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>address2002:52b6:8514:200:20c:76ff:fe3b:a3f4. The nice
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>thing with this is that I need no tunnel provider. The bad 
> >>>>>>thing is, of
> >>>>>>course, that it depends on IPv4.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>The way 6to4 works is that when my router detects an outgoing IPv6
> >>>>>>packet, it first checks the destination address. If it starts 
> >>>>>>with 2002,
> >>>>>>it rolls the packet inside an IPv4 packet, checks bits 16 
> >>>>>>through 48 in
> >>>>>>the destination address, and put those in the IPv4 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>destination address
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>field. For example, when communicating with my friend, 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>who also uses
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>6to4 and has the IPv4 address 213.132.111.101, I send a 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>packet to her
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>IPv6 address, 2002:d584:6f65::1. My router extracts 
> >>>>>>d584:6f65, which is
> >>>>>>213.132.111.101 in hexadecimal, and puts that in the IPv4 packet's
> >>>>>>destination address field, puts the IPv6 packet as the IPv4 
> >>>>>>payload, and
> >>>>>>sends the packet. When her computer picks it up, it 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>unwraps the IPv6
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>packet and uses it.
> >>>>>>When communicating with a non-6to4 address, my router sends 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>it, again
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>wrapped in an IPv4 packet, to a IPv4-to-IPv6 router on 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>the Internet.
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>Many ISPs support the anycast address 192.88.99.1, which 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>always means
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>"the closest IPv4-to-IPv6 router". When a non-6to4 host 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>wishes to send
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>v6 packets to me, it just sends them normally and the 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>IPv6 Internet
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>backbone will route them to the closest IPv6-to-IPv4 router, 
> >>>>>>which will
> >>>>>>wrap their package in an IPv4 packet, check the IPv6 
> >>>>>>destination address
> >>>>>>(2002:52b6:8514:X) and calculate the proper IPv4 destination 
> >>>>>>address (my
> >>>>>>82.182.133.20 address) from that, and send it to me over 
> >>>>>>IPv4. My router
> >>>>>>will then unwrap it when it gets it, and forward it over 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>my internal
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>IPv6 network.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>So as you see, 6to4 addresses are something quite 
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>different from the
> >>   
> >>
> >>>>>>2001::/48 block that you got from your tunnel provider.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>The /48 was given to me by the provider.  I am aware of the 
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>addresses 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>construction, just can't figure out how to get the clients 
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>to connect 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>through the router.
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>I still don't really understand what your actual problem 
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>is, after all
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Hope this helps.
> >>>>>>Fredrik Tolf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>---------
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>>>The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> >>>>>>Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>    
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         
> >>>>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> >>>Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>>
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to