Well, there is semantic_forms, it's kind of a Virtuoso on top of Jena TDB, but contrary to dbPedia instance of Virtuoso, one can load what (s)he wants. It's also kind of a Fuseki, with compliant SPARQL, plus generated forms and web framework.
Sandbox: semantic-forms.cc:9111/ Project; https://github.com/jmvanel/semantic_forms/wiki New release soon. 2017-04-04 15:34 GMT+02:00 <baran...@gmail.com>: > > This sounds like an interesting idea. Do you have some time to devote to >> it? What database are you thinking of serving? >> > > Well, we can take the same as Virtuoso, Dbpedia-dataset, THE BEST would be > EXACTLY the same as Virtuoso to make comparisons, but this is an old 'idea' > of mine, here in this listing about 5-6 years old, i think... > > thanks, baran > > > >> --- >> A. Soroka >> The University of Virginia Library >> >> On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:48 AM, baran...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:54:53 +0200, javed khan <javedbtk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> Why we need fuseki server in semantic web applications. We can run >>>> SPARQL >>>> queries without it, like we do using Jena syntax. >>>> >>> >>> If Fuseki would have had (like Virtuoso) a reference public endpoint >>> with a well known database, then were no need for such a question... >>> >>> baran >>> >>> -- >>> Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >>> >> >> > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > -- Jean-Marc Vanel http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http:/ /jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me Déductions SARL - Consulting, services, training, Rule-based programming, Semantic Web +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52 <+33%206%2089%2016%2029%2052> Twitter: @jmvanel , @jmvanel_fr ; chat: irc://irc.freenode.net#eulergui
