Many Thanks nikos :)

Hafez.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Yes. Asynchronous communication in SMPP is done with max-pending-submit.
> wait-ack and wait-ack-expire fine tune this behaviour.
>
> Nikos
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>  *From:* hafez ahmad <[email protected]>
> *To:* Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Falko Ziemann <[email protected]> ; [email protected]
>  *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 3:23 PM
> *Subject:* Re: error code 0x00000058
>
> Thanks Nikos for help what I need reference the smpp specification is *
> synchronous *connection*.*
>
> *The exchange of SMPP request and response PDUs between an ESME
> Transmitter and
> SMSC may occur synchronously or asynchronously as shown above. Thus an ESME
> may,
> if desired, send multiple requests to the SMSC, without synchronously
> waiting for the
> associated response PDUs.*
>
> is that down by max-pending-submit ?
>
> Regards and many thanks for your help
>
> Regards,
> Hafez
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  ESME_RMSGQFUL 0x00000014 Message Queue Full.
>>
>> Used to indicate a resource error within the MC. This may be interpreted
>> as the maximum number of messages addressed to a single destination or a
>> global maximum of undelivered messages within the MC.
>>
>> The waiting time for the Ack is in wait-ack. But I am not sure that this
>> is what you want.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  *From:* hafez ahmad <[email protected]>
>>   *To:* Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* Falko Ziemann <[email protected]> ; [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 3:00 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: error code 0x00000058
>>
>> Dears,
>>
>> Thanks for reply, I contact my operator and I solve the problem, but I
>> have the error SMSC returned error code 0x00000014 (Message Queue Full) in
>> response to submit_sm , and they says that I have to wait the sms response
>> then send a new sms, How can I control the waiting time for the response?
>>
>> i set both throughput = 25 and max-pending-submit = 5, if I set the
>> max-pending-submit = 6 I get the error, but if I do that the actual
>> throughput = 4 sms/sec.
>>
>> Please advice,
>>
>> Thanks again for help.
>>
>> Hafez
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  No. Actually bearerbox is the one with the SMSc connections. smsbox has
>>> nothing to do with it.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikos
>>>
>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  *From:* hafez ahmad <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* Falko Ziemann <[email protected]>
>>> *Cc:* [email protected]
>>>  *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 9:48 AM
>>> *Subject:* Re: error code 0x00000058
>>>
>>>   Dear Falko,
>>>
>>> 1st thanks Falko for you usual help :).
>>>
>>> I ask my operator if there are daily limitation, but he answer me NO, he
>>> gave me a TX connection with 25sms/sec, and I set the throughput = 20sms and
>>> the max-pending-submit = 10 , but I have the same problem, the max
>>> throughput that I get is 5 sms/sec, and I still get the Queue full error and
>>> Throttling error.
>>>
>>> I check my bandwidth, my I/O, my hardware and everything works fine,  any
>>> Ideas why I cant get the actual throughput?
>>>
>>> and if I have more than one SMSbox , is that improve the performance?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hafez
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, hafez ahmad <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hafez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But
>>>>> maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error
>>>>> because of this? ("spam")
>>>>> Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Flko
>>>>>
>>>>>  Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks falko,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any
>>>>> thing can I do it more ?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards.
>>>>> Hafez
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> SMPP Spec says: Throttling error (ESME has exceeded
>>>>>> allowed message limits)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too many messages in a too short time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Falko
>>>>>>  Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Dears
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it
>>>>>> mean:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned
>>>>>> error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Hafez
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hafez A.Ahmad
>>>>> Amman-Jordan
>>>>> mobile:962-785259011
>>>>>           962-795708728
>>>>> http://blog.hafezadnan.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hafez A.Ahmad
>>>> Amman-Jordan
>>>> mobile:962-785259011
>>>>           962-795708728
>>>> http://blog.hafezadnan.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hafez A.Ahmad
>>> Amman-Jordan
>>> mobile:962-785259011
>>>           962-795708728
>>> http://blog.hafezadnan.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hafez A.Ahmad
>> Amman-Jordan
>> mobile:962-785259011
>>           962-795708728
>> http://blog.hafezadnan.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Hafez A.Ahmad
> Amman-Jordan
> mobile:962-785259011
>           962-795708728
> http://blog.hafezadnan.com
>
>


-- 
Hafez A.Ahmad
Amman-Jordan
mobile:962-785259011
          962-795708728
http://blog.hafezadnan.com

Reply via email to