/etc/ifmap-server/basicauthusers.properties

It is mentioned here:
https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/wiki/OpenContrail-bring-up-and-provisioning

________________________________________
From: Users <[email protected]> on behalf of Phil Bedard 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:30 AM
To: Nipa Kumar; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] Issues installing Contrail 2.1

So the issue seems to be related to contrail-control not being able to connect 
to the IFMap server.  I see these in the ifmap-server.log.   I can't remember 
ever setting a username/password.

2015-03-13 14:27:26,394 [pool-6-thread-74] WARN   - ChannelThread: 
Authentication on 10.4.7.75:52348:79136 failed: Bad username/password
2015-03-13 14:27:26,395 [pool-6-thread-74] DEBUG  - ChannelThread: 
10.4.7.75:52348:79136 closed

Likewise I see these in the contrail-control log.

2015-03-13 Fri 14:29:18:050.165 EDT  contrail-main-1 [Thread 140324515297024, 
Pid 7963]: IFMapPeer [SYS_WARN]: IFMapServerConnection: Received 401 
Unauthorized. Incorrect username/password.  
controller/src/ifmap/client/ifmap_channel.cc 642

Where is this username/password stored?

Phil





-----Original Message-----
From: Nipa Kumar
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 21:11
To: Phil Bedard, "[email protected]"
Subject: Re: [Users] Issues installing Contrail 2.1

>Could u please send the output of /etc/contrail/contrail-vroute-agent.conf
>
>
>
>On 3/12/15 5:40 PM, "Phil Bedard" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I'm installing Contrail in a test lab on three VMs, Ubuntu 14.04 on all
>>the nodes.
>>
>>I've installed Contrail a couple times before in a similar setup and
>>haven't had too many issues but this time nothing seems to work.  I
>>populated the testbed.py file with three nodes.  One node acting as the
>>main config/controller/etc. and then two compute nodes.  The fab install
>>and fab setup commands all completed with no issues, however when I go
>>into the web UI, it shows the control node (running on the same node as
>>the webui) and two vrouters as down.  It also shows no config nodes or
>>analytics nodes present.
>>
>>On the compute nodes I see the following in the vrouter agent logs on
>>both hosts:
>>
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:35:59:182.489 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140269914363648, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203359182474
>>[SYS_INFO]: XmppConnectionLog: connection= [ ip_address = 10.4.7.75 state
>>= Connect event = Connect Event local_port = 39683 remote_port =
>>4294967295 ] file = controller/src/xmpp/xmpp_state_machine.cc line = 1264
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:35:59:182.641 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140270072567680, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203359182631 XMPP
>>[SYS_NOTICE]: XmppEventLog:  Mode Client:  Event: Tcp Connect Fail
>>peer:  10.4.7.75 controller/src/xmpp/xmpp_state_machine.cc 1051
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:35:59:182.714 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140269914363648, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203359182704
>>[SYS_INFO]: XmppConnectionLog: connection= [ ip_address = 10.4.7.75 state
>>= Connect next_state = Active event = EvTcpConnectFail ] file =
>>controller/src/xmpp/xmpp_state_machine.cc line = 1264
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:35:59:182.743 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140269914363648, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203359182736
>>[SYS_INFO]: XmppConnectionLog: connection= [ ip_address = 10.4.7.75 state
>>= Active event = Connect failed after retries ] file =
>>controller/src/xmpp/xmpp_state_machine.cc line = 1264
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:36:02:792.498 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140270072567680, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203362792487 TCP
>>[SYS_DEBUG]: TcpSessionMessageLog: Session
>>10.4.7.76:52563::10.4.7.75:8086(-1) < Active session connection complete
>>controller/src/io/tcp_session.cc 182
>>2015-03-12 Thu 19:36:10:794.678 EDT  contrail-compute-1 [Thread
>>140270072567680, Pid 1602]: SANDESH: Send FAILED: 1426203370794666 TCP
>>[SYS_DEBUG]: TcpSessionMessageLog: Session
>>10.4.7.76:52575::10.4.7.75:8086(-1) < Active session connection complete
>>controller/src/io/tcp_session.cc 182
>>
>>
>>
>>About the only thing that seems to work is the BGP peering session from
>>the control node to an external MX.
>>
>>Any pointers?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Phil
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.or
>>g
>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to