On 2015-05-17 15:50, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
HI,

 Today I had a good look at the open branding issues for RSEL7.

 I started out on the idea that all SRPMs with somehow centos in the
name are also appropriate for us to de/rebrand. Below is the list of
these package, sorted by "what to do with them".

 Could you please review if I missed any, or if you'd qualify any of
them differently?
 Can anyone please look at the logo's, indexhtml, noindex (from
httpd)? It would make a good first impression to have these things
right. But I'm not the right guy to fix them :)

 already good debranded / not a branding issue at all:
 ====================================================
 Tables abrt
 apache-commons-net
 perl-Module-Load-Conditional
 system-config-kdump

 branded, but of no use to RSEL (to remove from distro):
 ======================================================
 anaconda
 initial-setup
 kabi-yum-plugins
 subscription-manager

 branded, but no fix possible:
 ============================
 chrony
 ipa
 ntp
 system-config-date
 (all issues are with servers in a ntp config. I don't know what to
replace it with, so just leave it as-is)

 branded, "simple" technical fix to be done:
 ==========================================
 basesystem
 dhcp
 firefox
 libreport
 PackageKit
 plymouth
 redhat-lsb
 redhat-rpm-config
 sos
 thunderbird
 xulrunner
 yum

I presume you have all of the above under control. ;)
In some cases simply removing the patch from the src.rpm
that adds the upstream branding may be a good option.

 branded, in need of graphical/layout items:
 ==========================================
 centos-bookmarks
 centos-indexhtml
 httpd

I would expect the same approach as in the RS6 patches is
applicable to those.

 centos-logos

This I will try to look into ASAP. I am _hoping_ that we can
handle this by simply copying the relevant logos used in the RS6
packages, but if there are any that are of different size/type
they may need to be created.

Gordan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to